Factors influencing successful collaboration for freshwater management in Aotearoa, New Zealand

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Public participation in freshwater management has been widely advocated as an effective way to resolve the tensions between contested values and objectives while maintaining ecological integrity. However, questions remain regarding which processes and factors contribute to successful processes and outcomes for freshwater. Using a comparative case-study methodology, we unravel the "noise of participation" to assess the factors that influence the success of participatory decision making in collaborative processes currently underway in Hawke's Bay and Northland, Aotearoa, New Zealand. In Hawke's Bay, participants have been periodically surveyed to solicit their perceptions of how the process is working and the likelihood of achieving desirable outcomes. In Northland, five identical processes are currently underway, one per catchment, providing the basis for an intraregional assessment of collaboration. Our results suggest that participants' perceptions change within the process, and that those changes may involve complex, dynamic, and reciprocal interactions within the collaborative group. Results also show the strong influence of external conditions. The choice of stakeholder participants is also critical to ensuring the viability of collaboration. Key factors include participants' previous interactions and relationships, which may help to prime them for collaboration. These factors are dynamic and evolve through different cycles. Although both collaborative processes are still underway, these insights may help focus greater attention to process design and stakeholder selection from the outset to ensure successful outcomes. Ultimately, a successful collaborative process is one that is able to incorporate feedback and adapt to changing the dynamic and often complex external environment.

Adaptive and interactive climate futures: systematic review of ‘serious games’ for engagement and decision-making

“…It then moves on to explore evaluation of serious games, the impact of serious games, and finally finishes by examining the effectiveness of serious games in achieving social learning outcomes. A challenge for many forums aimed at collective learning, is the length of time and amount of engagement required (Cradock-Henry et al 2017). Given that social learning is less likely to occur in one-off engagements (Medema et al 2016), it is essential that serious games offer mechanisms and processes that become a part of an ongoing process of stakeholder interactions; though game design and development, facilitated interactions, gameplay, post-game discussions and briefings (ibid).…”

Transformations for Resilient Rural Futures: The Case of Kaikōura, Aotearoa-New Zealand

“…In New Zealand and elsewhere, social ties and recognition of the importance of place have had demonstrated resilience outcomes [8,25,93]. Accordingly, developing networks, fostering connections and promoting collaboration can all contribute to resilience pre-and post-disaster [43,94,95]. For example, the original group from the farmer's market network provided the basis for renewed debate and discussion about strengthening local food networks.…”

“…Resilience resonates with policy makers and researchers alike, and is often viewed in normative terms [3,36]-as a commitment to "become more resilient" [38]. Resilience has been criticised for its theoretical opacity [38], nevertheless it is a powerful explanatory framework for understanding responses to challenges, and is now applied in diverse contexts and across fields of study from psychology [39,40] to natural resource management [41][42][43].…”

Water ethics, justice, and equity in social-ecological systems conservation: lessons from the Queensland Wild Rivers Act

“…One way forward requires a more deliberate and strategic focus on relationship building, shared spaces, and explicit acknowledgement of power dynamics (Kingsford et al, 2011;Harmsworth et al, 2016;Tan, 2016;Cradock-Henry et al, 2017;Ayre et al, 2018). As one case, Harmsworth et al (2016) examine shared and collaborative Crown-council (regional and district) -Māori (iwi/ hapū) decision-making in freshwater management in New Zealand.…”

“…Visioning allows for values to be elucidated and developed in open forums while back-casting, or identifying how such visions can be achieved or forwarded (Gleick, 1998), allows for the identification of a broader set of barriers within natural resource management policies and laws. Such values and interests should also be iteratively revisited over time because the complexity of both social and natural dynamics precludes the ability of particular ethical stances to permanently govern social-ecological systems (Kingsford et al, 2011;Cradock-Henry et al, 2017).…”