2021
DOI: 10.1007/s43615-021-00119-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Driving the Adoption and Use Extent of Sustainable Land Management Practices in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As per these authors, older household heads are probably physically weaker and more resistant to change and hence less interested in adopting and maintaining SWC practices. However, the result is inconsistent with the results of prior studies (Agidew and Singh, 2018;Mekuriaw et al, 2018;Oduniyi, 2022) that older farmers are more experienced in perceiving erosion and limited participation in off-farm activities and hence are good in conservation investment.…”
Section: Agecontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As per these authors, older household heads are probably physically weaker and more resistant to change and hence less interested in adopting and maintaining SWC practices. However, the result is inconsistent with the results of prior studies (Agidew and Singh, 2018;Mekuriaw et al, 2018;Oduniyi, 2022) that older farmers are more experienced in perceiving erosion and limited participation in off-farm activities and hence are good in conservation investment.…”
Section: Agecontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…According to Asfaw and Neka (2017) and Nkonki-Mandleni et al (2022), households headed by women are less likely to invest in SWC structural maintenance due to a lack of labor, less access to information and the fact that they bear additional in-house responsibilities such as cooking and taking care of the family members. This result is consistent with previous research (Gedefaw et al, 2018;Limani, 2018;Ewunetu et al, 2021;Oduniyi, 2022), which found that male-headed households are more likely to use structural SWC practices but contradicts the findings of other studies (Atnafe et al, 2015;Belachew et al, 2020) that more female-headed households are probably continuing with technology use than males.…”
Section: Sexsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, Yang et al . (2021) and Oduniyi (2021) were of a contrary opinion and reported that female-headed households are more likely to adopt the combination of the three SCPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Gebre et al (2019) pronounced that intensity of the adoption of improved maize varieties (an example of innovation) is lower for female-headed households compared to maleheaded households where decisions are made jointly. However, Yang et al (2021) and Oduniyi (2021) were of a contrary opinion and reported that female-headed households are more likely to adopt the combination of the three SCPs.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Adoption Of Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in the developing world, agricultural extension has been described as "failing" (Government of Malawi, 2000), "moribund" (Eicher, 2001), "in disarray or barely functioning at all" (Rivera et al, 2001), or ineffective in responding to farmer demands and technological challenges (Ahikiriza et al, 2021). Factors like wealth, risk preferences, education, access and affordability of information and learning (Aker, 2011) can result in technology adoption slowing down and becoming more discontinuous, further threatening agricultural productivity (Oduniyi, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%