2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-022-06326-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors determining the subseasonal prediction skill of summer extreme rainfall over southern China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two statistical metrics are applied to evaluate the performance of each CMIP6 model: (1) The pattern correlation coefficient (PCC) measures the similarities of the spatial patterns between observations and simulations, and the range of PCC value is from −1 to 1 (Li et al, 2018; Zhu & Li, 2017); (2) The domain‐averaged normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) is adopted to measure the magnitude of error of the historical simulations (Lee & Wang, 2012; Wu et al, 2022). NRMSE is the root mean square error normalized by the observed spatial standard deviation, with reference to the whole NHLMD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two statistical metrics are applied to evaluate the performance of each CMIP6 model: (1) The pattern correlation coefficient (PCC) measures the similarities of the spatial patterns between observations and simulations, and the range of PCC value is from −1 to 1 (Li et al, 2018; Zhu & Li, 2017); (2) The domain‐averaged normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) is adopted to measure the magnitude of error of the historical simulations (Lee & Wang, 2012; Wu et al, 2022). NRMSE is the root mean square error normalized by the observed spatial standard deviation, with reference to the whole NHLMD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that subseasonal prediction for EA SAT is likely modulated by the mean state such as ENSO (Martin et al 2019) and tropical intraseasonal oscillation such as the MJO (e.g., Liang and Lin 2017;Lin 2018) and BSISO (Wu et al 2022), we reexamined the robustness of the above results by removing ENSO/MJO/BSISOassociated summers (Table S3 in the supplementary materials lists the new samples of each model after the elimination of ENSO/MJO/BSISO-associated summers).…”
Section: Dependence Of Subseasonal Prediction For Ea Sat On the Eiso-...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subseasonal prediction in boreal summer over EA is challenging owing to complex interactions between tropical monsoon variability and mid-high-latitude circulation systems (Liang and Lin 2017). Previous studies proved that subseasonal prediction sources over EA include preferable phases of the MJO (Lin 2018) and BSISO (Wu et al 2022), the ENSO state (Martin et al 2019), snowpack (Orsolini et al 2013;Li et al 2020), land surface conditions (Zeng and Yuan 2018;Xie et al 2019;Xue et al 2021) and stratospheric signals (Yu et al 2021). Conventional perspective considers the extratropical atmospheric perturbation as noise for prediction (Vimont et al 2001;Zhang et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subseasonal prediction in boreal summer over EA is challenging owing to complex interactions between tropical monsoon variability and mid-high-latitude circulation systems (Liang and Lin 2018). Previous studies demonstrated that subseasonal prediction sources over EA include preferable phases of the MJO (Lin 2018) and BSISO (Wu et al 2022), the ENSO state (Martin et al 2019), snowpack (Orsolini et al 2013;Li et al 2020), land surface conditions (Zeng and Yuan 2018;Xie et al 2019;Xue et al 2021) and stratospheric signals (Yu et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%