2003
DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960260306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors determining early improvement in mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis: A transthioracic and transesophageal prospective study

Abstract: SummaryBackground: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is frequently associated with aortic stenosis. Previous reports have shown that coexisting mitral insufficiency can potentially regress after aortic valve replacement.Hypothesis: This study sought to assess the frequency and severity of MR before and after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and to define the determinants of its postoperative evolution.Methods: For this purpose, 30 adult patients referred for aortic valve surgery underwent pre-and postopera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, AVR for AS, by reducing left ventricular (LV) afterload, might have the potential to improve mitral valve competence through reverse LV remodeling and reduced mitral annular size. Several authors 2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have attempted to determine predictive factors for MR changes after surgery. However, these studies, mostly limited by their retrospective nature and/or by the qualitative or semi-quantitative assessment of MR, have given conflicting results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, AVR for AS, by reducing left ventricular (LV) afterload, might have the potential to improve mitral valve competence through reverse LV remodeling and reduced mitral annular size. Several authors 2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have attempted to determine predictive factors for MR changes after surgery. However, these studies, mostly limited by their retrospective nature and/or by the qualitative or semi-quantitative assessment of MR, have given conflicting results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study fo und that, im pro ve ment of MR was not asso ci a ted with the mit ral cal ci fi ca ti on or at ri al di lati on re por ted el sew he re, 5 tho ugh this may be du e to the low pre va len ce of mit ral cal ci fi ca ti on (29.8%) in com pa ri son with ot her stu di es. 15 Our study ag ree with Emily et al, 16 study as we fo und that: con serva ti ve, ta i lo red ap pro ach to con co mi tant mit ral surgery in pa ti ent pre sen ting for cor rec ti on of aor tic ste no sis who de mons tra te func ti o nal mit ral re gurgi ta ti on.…”
Section: Mr (38)mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…4 Alt ho ugh im pro ve ments in deg re e of MR ha ve be en re por ted af ter iso la ted AVR. 5,6 The abi lity to pre dict per sis tent MR af ter AVR is con si de red im por tant, but re la ti vely few stu di es ha ve analy zed the cli ni cal im pact of functi o nal MR. Furt her mo re, the ma jo rity of per for med stu di es ha ve be en of small sca le and ha ve not exami ned func ti o nal out co mes or so ught to iden tify pre dic tors of per sis tent MR.…”
Section: Effect Of Aortic Valve Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural reduction of MR due to the left ventricular recovery after AVR has been reported. 7) However, the studies were limited to patients with aortic stenosis (AS) in the majority of previous reports. 7,8) Ruel and coworkers 9) reported the risk factors of heart failure and persistent mitral regurgitation after AVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) However, the studies were limited to patients with aortic stenosis (AS) in the majority of previous reports. 7,8) Ruel and coworkers 9) reported the risk factors of heart failure and persistent mitral regurgitation after AVR. In their report, they considered an FMR greater than grade 2" and a left atrial diameter over 5 cm, a preoperative peak aortic valve gradient less than 60 mmHg, or atrial fibrillation were risk factors for CHF and persistent mitral regurgitation after AVR in AS patients, while an FMR greater than grade 2" and a left ventricular end-systolic diameter less than 45 mm were risk factors in AR patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%