2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors contributing to the perpetuation and eradication of female genital mutilation/cutting in sub-Saharan women living in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of a total 10 questions, each question received a score of two for "Yes", one for "Can't Tell", and zero for "No". The total score (out of 20 possible) categorizes papers as low (0-10), moderate (11)(12)(13), or high quality (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). For quantitative observational cross-sectional studies, the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS) checklist was employed, with 20 questions scored similarly, resulting in categorization as low (0-19), moderate (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), or high quality (31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40), based on the overall score [16].…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Out of a total 10 questions, each question received a score of two for "Yes", one for "Can't Tell", and zero for "No". The total score (out of 20 possible) categorizes papers as low (0-10), moderate (11)(12)(13), or high quality (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). For quantitative observational cross-sectional studies, the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS) checklist was employed, with 20 questions scored similarly, resulting in categorization as low (0-19), moderate (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), or high quality (31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40), based on the overall score [16].…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixteen studies were classified as being of high methodological quality, and the remaining one was deemed to be of moderate quality; none were rated as poor. Among the qualitative studies, excluding two [17,18], there was a consistent failure to adequately address considerations such as the relationship between the research and participants or justification of the research design [19], utilization of qualitative methodology to achieve research goals, or ethical considerations regarding obtaining consent [20]. In the case of quantitative studies, while information on measures taken to address non-responders was generally missing, one study lacked clear explanations on how and what type of consent was obtained [21].…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, men within these communities place great emphasis on the concept of virginity and faithfulness, viewing FGM as a prerequisite for women and girls to be regarded as proper, clean, and decent (48). The sight of uncircumcised girls and women facing insults and isolation can influence some adult women to accept FGM as a means of belonging to their community (12,47). Over the past two decades, there has been a notable rise in efforts to eliminate female genital mutilation (16,49).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the consent of the child is never obtained before subjecting them to this harmful procedure ( 11 ). Despite being considered an act of violence, FGM is still prevalent in certain countries and communities ( 12 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation