2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors contributing to level and type of child welfare involvement following prenatal substance exposure: A scoping review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22][23] While pregnant people may consider reducing use of substances during the perinatal period, 24,25 strong stigma hampers access to treatment including concerns of being reported to child protective services, and this stigma is worse in people of color and those experiencing lower socioeconomic status. [26][27][28][29][30][31] Further, the importance of these research questions is paramount given the closing of the gender gap in substance use, lower access to treatment in women, racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities, 32,33 lack of funding for substance use treatment, and the consequent (due to underfunding) lack of high-quality integrated programs for mothers and their infants despite encouraging clinical trial results of such interventions. [34][35][36][37][38] To summarize, in perinatal people with more severe maltreatment experiences and early substance use initiation, these stunted socioemotional growth trajectories lead to increased risks for two generations (parent and offspring), negatively impacting parental, dyadic, and infant socioemotional development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23] While pregnant people may consider reducing use of substances during the perinatal period, 24,25 strong stigma hampers access to treatment including concerns of being reported to child protective services, and this stigma is worse in people of color and those experiencing lower socioeconomic status. [26][27][28][29][30][31] Further, the importance of these research questions is paramount given the closing of the gender gap in substance use, lower access to treatment in women, racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities, 32,33 lack of funding for substance use treatment, and the consequent (due to underfunding) lack of high-quality integrated programs for mothers and their infants despite encouraging clinical trial results of such interventions. [34][35][36][37][38] To summarize, in perinatal people with more severe maltreatment experiences and early substance use initiation, these stunted socioemotional growth trajectories lead to increased risks for two generations (parent and offspring), negatively impacting parental, dyadic, and infant socioemotional development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%