2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with landowner involvement in forest conservation programs in the U.S.: Implications for policy design and outreach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss2/art46/ There is similar disagreement in the literature on the influence of recreational land use and conservation behavior, with some studies identifying recreational benefits as key drivers of conservation behavior (Bliss 1989, Koontz 2001, Brenner et al 2013) and others finding it to be inconsequential (Bourke and Luloff 1994). Often, recreational benefits are cited in the context of nonmonetary benefits of land ownership and can include preserving forest land for hiking (Koontz 2001), wildlife viewing (Campbell andKittredge 1996, Koontz 2001), and landscape aesthetics (Koontz 2001, Erickson et al 2002, Ma et al 2012.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss2/art46/ There is similar disagreement in the literature on the influence of recreational land use and conservation behavior, with some studies identifying recreational benefits as key drivers of conservation behavior (Bliss 1989, Koontz 2001, Brenner et al 2013) and others finding it to be inconsequential (Bourke and Luloff 1994). Often, recreational benefits are cited in the context of nonmonetary benefits of land ownership and can include preserving forest land for hiking (Koontz 2001), wildlife viewing (Campbell andKittredge 1996, Koontz 2001), and landscape aesthetics (Koontz 2001, Erickson et al 2002, Ma et al 2012.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open space programs, federal and state tax laws as well as the strong presence of civil society organizations such as land trusts and other non-governmental organizations (NGOs) offer a large number of incentives and opportunities to private landowners to engage voluntarily (George 2002;Ma et al 2012). Conservation easements, conservation contracts, provisions under the Farm Bill such as the Conservation Reserve Program, Grassland Reserve Program are a few examples of the many tools that support voluntary private land conservation in the US (Rissman et al 2006;USDA-ERS 2014).…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we consider the stakeholders who provide ecosystem services in PES programs, they are usually located in rural area [8][9][10]. Pagiola et al [11] divide the factors affecting farmers' participation in PES programs into three groups: eligibility, desirability, and ability, with passive or active characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%