2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Associated with Early Deterioration after Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Background and PurposeSpontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating form of stroke with a poor prognosis overall. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and describe factors associated with early neurologic deterioration (END) after ICH.MethodsWe sought to identify any factor which could be prognostic in the absence of an intervention. The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, the Global Health Library, and PubMed were searched for primary studies from the years 1966 to 2012 with no r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
52
2
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(34 reference statements)
9
52
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In our opinion, a higher prognostic value of septum pellucidum displacement in comparison with pineal gland displacement for the vital prognosis determination is not only due to ICHV influence, but also to the perifocal edema severity and its influence on the outcome of disease in the acute period. The obtained data are consistent with the results of other studies in which the leading role of the primary mechanisms of brain damage (including dislocation syndrome) in the lethal outcome of SSICH in the acute period was proved [9,10,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our opinion, a higher prognostic value of septum pellucidum displacement in comparison with pineal gland displacement for the vital prognosis determination is not only due to ICHV influence, but also to the perifocal edema severity and its influence on the outcome of disease in the acute period. The obtained data are consistent with the results of other studies in which the leading role of the primary mechanisms of brain damage (including dislocation syndrome) in the lethal outcome of SSICH in the acute period was proved [9,10,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The informative value of ICH volume in patients with SIVH is inferior to that of IVH volume and AMS as for the vital and functional outcomes prognosis of SSICH in the acute period determination, which accords with the results of other studies which have proved the negative influence of SIVH presence and severity on the SSICH course and outcome in the acute period [5,13,17]. Our study has determined critical value of IVHV (>24.5 mL), which is the predictor of SSICH lethal outcome in the acute period (Se = 84.6 %, Sp = 96.5 %; OR 95 % CI = 1.18 (1.07-1.30), P = 0.0007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In accordance with the numerous studies, the presence of secondary IVH is an independent predictor of early clinical deterioration and poor outcome in patients with SICH [4,9,10], which suggests the presence of secondary IVH in the spectrum of parameters associated with the acute period outcome of the disease [11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Random selection resulted in composition of a contemporary ICH sample regarding age, antithrombotic drugs, treatment, and clot size. [6][7][8][9] Selection did not account for balance of different hematoma locations or occurrence of intraventricular hemorrhage, however, which could have negatively influenced the accuracy of ABC/2 in agreement analysis. Nevertheless, strong agreement of algorithm and manual segmentations simultaneously supports the algorithm's validity, despite a potential selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of surgery in the treatment of ICH still remains inconclusive, despite recent large randomized trials, however. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Part of the controversy about the value of surgical interventions might be explained by the fact that hematoma volume, a key prognostic factor of interest, has rarely been measured in precise volumetric fashion in surgical outcome studies. [10][11][12][13][14] Instead, clot volume is commonly estimated by the formula ABC/2 until today, owing to the unparalleled applicability and time efficiency of this method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%