2019
DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2019.1669398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting use of organic fertilizer among smallholder farmers in Sekela district of Amhara region, Northwestern Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those households mostly engaged in sustainable crop production practices with less attention to immediate benefits. Consistent with this suggestions, Abebe and Debebe [79] reported that illiterate households prefer to apply organic sources of fertilizers as compared with educated households for crop production. In contrast, a positive association of education level was obtained with intercropping, supplementary irrigation, and soil and water conservation adaptation strategies.…”
Section: Education Levelmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Those households mostly engaged in sustainable crop production practices with less attention to immediate benefits. Consistent with this suggestions, Abebe and Debebe [79] reported that illiterate households prefer to apply organic sources of fertilizers as compared with educated households for crop production. In contrast, a positive association of education level was obtained with intercropping, supplementary irrigation, and soil and water conservation adaptation strategies.…”
Section: Education Levelmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Participation in extension service negatively influences choice organic fertilizer, revealing that farmers are not aware of organic fertilizer or lack available organic fertilizer sources. However, opposite relations were found by Abebe and Debebe (2019). The farmers who have access to sufficient credit facilities are less likely to apply organic fertilizer than those who have no credit-constrained, indicating that farmers may use their credit for food security requirements than farming practice.…”
Section: Psm For Finding the Proper Counterfactual Group Of Organic Fertilizer Usersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…From related literature, evidence on farmers' soil management decisions suggests many farmer characteristics of interest in this study (Waithaka et al, 2007;Shiferaw et al, 2009;Parvan, 2011;Chikowo et al, 2014;Borges et al, 2015;Abebe and Debebe, 2019;Mellon-Badi et al, 2020). Kassie et al (2013) group these factors into: 1) farmer characteristics, including age, gender, educational attainment in the household, participation in non-farm work, organic fertiliser experience and risk attitude score, 2) social capital factors, including contact with extension agents, farmers' group membership, access to organic fertiliser policy and training opportunities, and 3) physical resource characteristics such as livestock, carting equipment, plot size and total landholding.…”
Section: Empirical Specification Of the Rasch Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farmers' background conditions determine attitudes through farm goals, beliefs and perceptions about how easy a technology is to use. In turn, these influence the probability of performing actual practices and the decisions they take (Ridgley and Brush, 2015;Shiferaw et al, 2009;Parvan, 2011;Chikowo et al, 2014;Borges et al, 2015;Abebe and Debebe, 2019).…”
Section: Assessment Of Farmers' Attitudes: Classical Versus Behavioural Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%