Factors Affecting The Consumers ' Purchase Decision Safe Food: Case Study in Vietnam

Thang, Dao Quyet; Dung, Doan Viet; Dung, Nguyễn Thị Thùy; Giang, Nguyen Thi Thuy

doi:10.26677/tr1010.2019.72

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It can be classified into three orientations: (1) farmers' adoption of GAP standards; (2) farmers' compliance with a GAP standard; (3) consumer buying behavior and decision-making processes associated with GAP-certified food products. In the following sections, the first two are reviewed regarding their relevance to the purpose of this research (for research on consumer buying behavior and decision-making process, see Giao [24], Thai and Pensupar [25], and Wongprawmas and Canavari [26]). Studies on farmers' adoption of public GAP standards are focused on identifying the critical factors influencing their standard adoption.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Producers’ Perceptions of Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard and Their Pesticide Use: The Case of Q-GAP for Cabbage Farming in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined the effectiveness of Thailand’s Q-GAP initiative in raising cabbage farmers’ awareness regarding food safety assurance and improving their pesticide use practices by comparing 41 Q-GAP-certified and 90 uncertified farmers in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. The research methods included a questionnaire survey administered to the participating farmers and laboratory pesticide residue testing of their cabbage produce samples. The research found that certified farmers had a significantly more heedful attitude than uncertified farmers toward the effects of pesticide use on the users, consumers, and the environment. This is supported by the higher level of Q-GAP training experiences. Compared to uncertified farmers, a significantly lower proportion of certified farmers also applied either insecticide, fungicide, or herbicide, with significantly less frequencies when including in the analysis those who did not use the particular pesticide. In the pesticide residue analysis, no significant difference was found between the two types of farms regarding the number of farms detected with minimum residue level exceedance in the sample produce and regarding the results of the aggregate organophosphate pesticide analysis. However, it was found that the produce of the uncertified farmers contained significantly more residue in the aggregate synthetic pyrethroid pesticide analysis as compared to that of the certified farmers. These findings indicate the Q-GAP-certified farmers’ progress in process control from earlier Q-GAP studies on compliance. However, considering the limited achievements of certified farmers in pesticide handling and recordkeeping, and those of the Department of Agriculture officers in auditing, there is a need for more governmental efforts, especially in these areas.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Producers’ Perceptions of Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard and Their Pesticide Use: The Case of Q-GAP for Cabbage Farming in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In contemporary economic research, consumer confidence is regarded as an important indicator of market behavior, particularly in the realm of food safety, where consumer confidence in food directly affects their purchasing decisions and consumption behaviors ( 46 , 47 ). Signaling theory provides a robust framework to explain how agricultural insurance can act as a positive signal, influencing consumer confidence in food safety.…”

Section: Theoretical Analysis and Research Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of agricultural insurance on consumer food safety: empirical evidence from provincial-level data in China

Ruan,

Yin,

Zhang

2024

Front. Nutr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the exploration of the efficacy of agricultural subsidy policies, agricultural insurance, as a key element of this policy system, has garnered widespread attention for its potential impact on consumer food safety. This paper delves into the influence of agricultural insurance on the safety of food consumed by individuals, based on provincial panel data in China from 2011 to 2021. The findings indicate that agricultural insurance significantly reduces the incidence of foodborne disease and enhances food safety. Mediating effect tests reveal that agricultural insurance effectively boosts food safety through two key pathways: promoting innovation in agricultural technology and reducing environmental pollution. Moreover, the analysis of moderating effects highlights that increased consumer confidence positively enhances the impact of agricultural insurance. Heterogeneity tests further show that in the provinces with higher levels of agricultural development and stronger government support for agriculture, the role of agricultural insurance in improving food safety is more pronounced. This research not only empirically verifies the effectiveness of agricultural insurance in enhancing food safety but also provides robust theoretical support and practical guidance for the precise formulation and effective implementation of agricultural subsidy policies, particularly agricultural insurance policies, offering significant reference value for policy-makers.

show abstract

Factors Affecting The Consumers ' Purchase Decision Safe Food: Case Study in Vietnam

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

Producers’ Perceptions of Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard and Their Pesticide Use: The Case of Q-GAP for Cabbage Farming in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand

Producers’ Perceptions of Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard and Their Pesticide Use: The Case of Q-GAP for Cabbage Farming in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand

The impact of agricultural insurance on consumer food safety: empirical evidence from provincial-level data in China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About