1982
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182000051696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. Evidence that the mechanisms which mediate resistance during early patent infections may lack immunological specificity

Abstract: SUMMARYMice infected with 25 to 35 unsexed Schistosoma mansoni cercariae became resistant to homologous challenge by 8 weeks, and the degree of resistance that was acquired correlated with the size of the worm burden and the tissue egg burden. Mice given 100 male or 100 female cercariae alone failed to become resistant even after 30–40 weeks of infection. When a super-infection of 100 male or 100–300 female cercariae was given to mice with 25 unsexed cercariae, the degree of resistance that was acquired was ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure of both the single sex-infected and the egg-injected mice to develop significant resistance confirms earlier results (Dean et al 1978, Bickle et al 1979b, Harrison et al 1982 and again highlights the question as to whether chronically infected mice develop resistance by immunologically-specific mechanisms. It has been suggested that the resistance of chronically infected mice to challenge is due to the interference with the normal migration of challenge schistosomula as a consequence of the pathological disturbance associated with intravascular egg deposition (Wilson 1980, Harrison et al 1982, rather than to immunologically specific anti-schistosomula effector mechanisms. This conclusion seems to be consistent with the failure of certain groups of workers to demonstrate passive protection by either parabiosis or serum transfer (Dean, Bukowski & Clark 198 I , Harrison et al 1982) using the chronically-infected mouse, whereas resistance conferred by vaccination with irradiated cercariae is transferable by parabiosis (Dean et al 1981).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The failure of both the single sex-infected and the egg-injected mice to develop significant resistance confirms earlier results (Dean et al 1978, Bickle et al 1979b, Harrison et al 1982 and again highlights the question as to whether chronically infected mice develop resistance by immunologically-specific mechanisms. It has been suggested that the resistance of chronically infected mice to challenge is due to the interference with the normal migration of challenge schistosomula as a consequence of the pathological disturbance associated with intravascular egg deposition (Wilson 1980, Harrison et al 1982, rather than to immunologically specific anti-schistosomula effector mechanisms. This conclusion seems to be consistent with the failure of certain groups of workers to demonstrate passive protection by either parabiosis or serum transfer (Dean, Bukowski & Clark 198 I , Harrison et al 1982) using the chronically-infected mouse, whereas resistance conferred by vaccination with irradiated cercariae is transferable by parabiosis (Dean et al 1981).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The protective effects of unisexual primary infections against a bisexual challenge infection have been analyzed in two animal models: the mouse and the monkey. Unisexual primary infections in mice induced lower levels of resistance against a schistosome challenge infection compared to bisexual ones (Bickle et al 1979;MotaSantos et al 1981;Harrison et al 1982;Moloney et al 1986). Moreover, no difference in the protective effect was observed between unisexual male and female primary infections (Bickle et al 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the intensity of transmission, age < 14 5 and sexual immaturity in humans have been associated with increased reinfection with S. mansoni. [6][7][8] Male sex has also been associated with increased susceptibility and severity of schistosomiasis, both in laboratory animals, 9 and population studies conducted in endemic areas. 10 To study whether other host factors, such as immune responsiveness or nutritional status, might be related to treatment outcome, we conducted a prospective cohort study of 106 infected children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%