2016
DOI: 10.1188/16.onf.e132-e142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting Quality of Life for Korean American Cancer Survivors: An Integrative Review

Abstract: Problem Identification There is limited understanding of Korean American cancer survivors’ quality of life (QOL) within a cultural context. The study examined factors associated with the QOL of Korean American cancer survivors. Literature Search A systematic literature search of PubMed, CINAHL®, Google Scholar, and EBSCO databases from January 2000 to January 2014. Data Evaluation The studies were assessed for the relevance to the purpose of the review. Each study was rated on a 2-point scale using an 11-i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Families were the main source of support for survivors, bringing physical and emotional benefits that influenced having a satisfactory HRQoL. An integrative review on factors that affected HRQOL in cancer patients in South Korea showed how social support, increased family support, and good family communication were associated with satisfactory HRQoL, confirming the findings of this review 57 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Families were the main source of support for survivors, bringing physical and emotional benefits that influenced having a satisfactory HRQoL. An integrative review on factors that affected HRQOL in cancer patients in South Korea showed how social support, increased family support, and good family communication were associated with satisfactory HRQoL, confirming the findings of this review 57 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…An integrative review on factors that affected HRQOL in cancer patients in South Korea showed how social support, increased family support, and good family communication were associated with satisfactory HRQoL, confirming the findings of this review. 57 Similarly to this review, a meta-synthesis with elderly people with chronic diseases showed hope as an important psychological resource to deal with a chronic disease, and was related to improvement in the sense of self, feelings of control, relationships with others, and HRQoL. 58 In addition, spirituality in the elderly was manifested by prayers and belief in a deity, contributing to the process of resignification of the HRQoL experience.…”
Section: Explanation Of the Cerqual Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Social support from family is a major resource for coping with stress among Korean Americans. Many Korean Americans also rely on their religious communities to extend their social networks, gain helpful information, and transition to a new environment . Consistent with stress coping theory, illness appraisals also predicted patient's QOL; those with fewer negative perceptions about their cancer had better QOL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Social support representing assistance provided by family, friends, and others is positively associated with both better physical and mental QOL among Korean Americans . C ommunication and communication style also influence cancer patients' and caregivers' QOL and shaped by culture and ethnicity . Koreans use high‐context communication style which is derived from Confucianism and emphasizes nonverbal, indirect exchange of information .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may account for the major difference in social welfare between breast cancer survivors from Taiwan and in other countries. Cultural differences including self-stigma and gender stereotyping might affect willingness to RTW for Asian cancer patients [ 45 , 46 ]. However, as a result of the limitations of our database, future studies are required to address these issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%