1998
DOI: 10.1007/s000110050359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting pain intensity in a pain model based upon tonic intranasal stimulation in humans

Abstract: The non-invasive pain stimulus was found to be easily applicable and the evoked pain sensation could be modified by variation of humidity and temperature of the air-stream.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to solve the temperature problem in a quick and unconventional way, mobile baby bottle warmer can be used. Without adjusting humididy or temperature, the airflow should be restricted to 5 l/min to avoid an exceedance of the pain threshold (Loetsch et al, 1998). This design does not take respiratory recordings into account.…”
Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to solve the temperature problem in a quick and unconventional way, mobile baby bottle warmer can be used. Without adjusting humididy or temperature, the airflow should be restricted to 5 l/min to avoid an exceedance of the pain threshold (Loetsch et al, 1998). This design does not take respiratory recordings into account.…”
Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 is converted into bicarbonate and protons (Tarun et al, 2003), which have been shown to excite trigeminal nociceptors via activating TRPV1 (Reeh and Kress, 2001) or TRPA1 (Wang et al, 2010) ion channels. This pain model is well established for clinical pharmacological pain research (eg, Kobal et al, 1990;Lötsch et al, 1998Lötsch et al, , 2006 including fMRI assessments (Oertel et al, 2008).…”
Section: Experimental Pain and Stimulation Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their nociceptive specificity is supported by showing in a magnetoencephalography experiment that they evoke cortical potentials generated in the pain relevant secondary somatosensory area (Huttunen et al, 1986). The pain model used is well established (Kobal et al, 1990;Lötsch J et al, 1998;Lötsch J et al, 2006) including fMRI assessments (Small et al, 2005;Oertel et al, 2008).…”
Section: Pain Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%