2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting food waste at the downstream entities of the supply chain: A critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As to perform an explicit, transparent and reproducible strategy, achieving the double purpose of methodological objectivity and efficacy of the review itself, the present research applies a successful approach ( Özbük and Cos ¸kun, 2020;Rana et al, 2021). It consists of four different steps, as follows: (a) definition of the background of the analysis, and identification of research questions and review criteria; (b) selection of suitable research strings and creation of a preliminary database; (c) in-depth screening of selected items and improvement of the opening database; and (d) data synthesis and data analysis.…”
Section: Research Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to perform an explicit, transparent and reproducible strategy, achieving the double purpose of methodological objectivity and efficacy of the review itself, the present research applies a successful approach ( Özbük and Cos ¸kun, 2020;Rana et al, 2021). It consists of four different steps, as follows: (a) definition of the background of the analysis, and identification of research questions and review criteria; (b) selection of suitable research strings and creation of a preliminary database; (c) in-depth screening of selected items and improvement of the opening database; and (d) data synthesis and data analysis.…”
Section: Research Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equally, changing diets towards less fertiliser-reliant crops and increasing efficiencies along the food supply chain would enable additional reductions in the demand for fertilisers and GHG emissions 44,45 . Although the influence of changes in these parameters is not explored in this article, exploring this space could identify other opportunities to further reduce the demand for fertilisers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, and as indicated by the sensitivity analysis, not achieving the 48% breakeven recovery renders the animal feed production from FW infeasible. This is a long leap from the tested 13.5% threshold and therefore requires segregation early in the food supply chain [ 60 , 148 ] to outweigh the cost of contamination in animal feed processed from FW. Accompanied by FW reduction, this allows for better alignment to CE framework objectives [ 113 , 136 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%