Factors affecting Cook Gunther Tulip and Cook Celect inferior vena cava filter retrieval success

Glocker, Roan J.; Novák, Zdeněk; Matthews, Thomas C.; Patterson, Mark A.; Jordan, William D.; Pearce, Benjamin J.; Passman, Marc A.

doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.09.002

Cited by 13 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[3][4][5] Although poor clinical follow-up of patients with these devices plays an important role, 6 prolonged filter implantation has been associated with retrieval failure rates as high as 43%. [7][8][9][10][11] Furthermore, prolonged rIVCF dwell time is associated with device-related complications, including fracture, migration, organ penetration, and increased risk of deep venous thrombosis. 11 These concerns were mirrored in a 2014 safety communication issued by the US Food and Drug Administration urging rIVCF retrieval once no longer indicated.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Defining Prolonged Dwell Time: When Are Advanced Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Techniques Necessary?

Desai

Laws

Salem

et al. 2017

Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background— Despite growth in placement of retrievable inferior vena cava filters, retrieval rates remain low. Filters with extended implantation times present a challenge to retrieval, where standard techniques often fail. The development of advanced retrieval techniques has positively impacted retrieval of retrievable inferior vena cava filters with prolonged dwell times; however, there is no precise definition of the time point when advanced techniques become necessary. We aim to define prolonged retrievable inferior vena cava filters dwell time by determining the inflection point when the risk of standard retrieval technique failure increases significantly, necessitating advanced retrieval techniques to maintain overall technical success of retrieval. Methods and Results— From January 2009 to April 2015, 762 retrieval procedures were identified from a prospectively acquired database. We assessed patient age/sex, filter dwell time, procedural technical success, the use of advanced techniques, and procedure-related adverse events. Overall retrieval success rate was 98% (n=745). When standard retrieval techniques failed, advanced techniques were used; this was necessary 18% of the time (n=138). Logistic regression identified that dwell time was the only risk factor for failure of standard retrieval technique (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–1.10; P <0.001). Spline function regression analysis demonstrated that if dwell time exceeded 7 months, the risk of standard technique failure was 40.9%. Adverse events occurred at a rate of 2% (n=18; 15 minor and 3 major). Conclusions— The necessity of advanced techniques to maintain technical success of retrieval increases with dwell time. Patients with retrievable inferior vena cava filters in place beyond 7 months may benefit from referral to centers with expertise in advanced filter retrieval.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Defining Prolonged Dwell Time: When Are Advanced Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Techniques Necessary?

Desai

Laws

Salem

et al. 2017

Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous studies have reported similar retrieval success rates. [18][19][20] We noted a significant difference between the rate at ≤3 months and that at >3 months after implantation in terms of the proportion of use of advanced techniques. Dasei et al 21 reported the results of 648 retrieval procedures with various types of r-IVCF in their institution.…”

Section: Predictive Factors and Cutoff Indwelling Time For The Use Ofmentioning

confidence: 77%

Impact of Advanced Technique on Improvement in the Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Rate

Anzai

Takaesu

Yaguchi

et al. 2021

Circ J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

determine the retrieval success rate with advanced techniques, the independent predictors for r-IVCF retrieval failure with the standard retrieval technique, and the appropriate timing for performing retrieval. Methods Study Population and Protocol Patients who underwent r-IVCF retrieval procedure at Ota Memorial Hospital between April 2012 and December 2018 were consecutively enrolled. The timing of the retrieval was at the discretion of each attending physician, considering the clinical condition of each patient, including low ongoing risk of venous thromboembolic event, possibility of being able to undergo anticoagulation, improved ambulatory capability, and acceptable medical profile; retrieval attempt within 3 months after implantation was generally recommended. 7 In all patients, pre-retrieval computed tomography (pre-CT) with contrast was scheduled within 2 weeks before the retrieval procedure to evaluate filter characteristics, amount of residual thrombus in the pulmonary artery and the pelvic and limbs veins, and trapped thrombus in the r-IVCF.

show abstract

“…9 Glocker and colleagues described angulation greater than 20° within the vena cava, likely reducing the success of IVC filter retrieval. 10 In our experience, the filter tip was positioned 1 cm below the lowest renal vein to avoid acute misalignment or step-off.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biopsy Forceps-Assisted Loop Snare Technique for Complex Retrieval of Inferior Vena Cava Filter

Yao

Zhu

et al. 2022

Vasc Endovascular Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Severe tilt with embedded hooks is a common obstacle to successful inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval. We present a case for which the biopsy forceps-assisted loop snare technique was successfully used to retrieve filters with hooks embedded in the IVC wall for which conventional retrieval failed. The technique is effective and provides a less-invasive, low-cost method for the complex retrieval of IVC filters.

show abstract

Factors affecting Cook Gunther Tulip and Cook Celect inferior vena cava filter retrieval success

Cited by 13 publications

References 23 publications

Defining Prolonged Dwell Time: When Are Advanced Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Techniques Necessary?

Defining Prolonged Dwell Time: When Are Advanced Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Techniques Necessary?

Impact of Advanced Technique on Improvement in the Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Rate

Biopsy Forceps-Assisted Loop Snare Technique for Complex Retrieval of Inferior Vena Cava Filter

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About