Academic and scientific conferences are necessary for the dissemination of research, for networking, and to support professional development (Rowe, 2018;Yoo & Chon, 2008). Communication between researchers and other stakeholders occurs formally at talks and poster sessions, and informally at social events, while professional development usually occurs through workshops and mentoring events. Traditionally, conferences have been held as in-person meetings, and with the increase in international collaborations, delegates travel across the globe to attend these events. Yet, the ethics of conferences have been called into question (e.g., Fraser et al., 2017;Holden et al., 2017). If these events are so integral to scientific development should we accept that they exclude participation of researchers with limited funding? Should we accept that conference travel results in such a large carbon footprint? Alternatively, online conferencing has provided an option for researchers to connect without the same commitment to cost, time, and carbon impact (e.g., Raby & Madden, in review). Online conferences started off as a simple email-based event (Anderson, 1996), and due to the COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly become more common and integral to scientific communication (Milić et al., 2020;Viglione, 2020). In order to maintain the enthusiasm of online conferencing, it is vital that we take this opportunity to feedback from the events that have been organized during the COVID-19 pandemic. The key indicator of delegate enthusiasm for online conference material is their engagement during the event, either indicated quantitatively by their accessing different parts of the meeting (e.g., visiting webpages, viewing