2013
DOI: 10.5582/bst.2013.v7.4.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting childhood immunization in Lao People's Democratic Republic: A cross-sectional study from nationwide, population-based, multistage cluster sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coverage for NIP vaccines ranged between 87.9% and 100.0%, while the coverage for non-NIP vaccines ranged between 0% between 74.8%. Our observation agreed with previous reports from U.S. 13 The maternal determinants identified in our study for immunization coverage of non-NIP vaccines, such as lower education level, mother with a job, mother' s poor awareness of vaccination, were in agreement with the findings of previous studies [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . There were some reasons for that: first, education level may influence mother's knowledge of and attitude and behavior to take advantage of vaccination service for her child; second, mothers with jobs may not have enough time to spare for the primary healthcare including immunization, and may be less aware of the information on immunization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…The coverage for NIP vaccines ranged between 87.9% and 100.0%, while the coverage for non-NIP vaccines ranged between 0% between 74.8%. Our observation agreed with previous reports from U.S. 13 The maternal determinants identified in our study for immunization coverage of non-NIP vaccines, such as lower education level, mother with a job, mother' s poor awareness of vaccination, were in agreement with the findings of previous studies [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . There were some reasons for that: first, education level may influence mother's knowledge of and attitude and behavior to take advantage of vaccination service for her child; second, mothers with jobs may not have enough time to spare for the primary healthcare including immunization, and may be less aware of the information on immunization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Multivariate analysis showed that high literacy, better wealth index, and residing in the southern part of the country were significantly related to better vaccination rates. This finding supports the findings of Kitamura et al (2013) and Danis et al (2010) that continuation and completion of the required number of vaccinations in children depended on the mother´s educational level, socioeconomic status, employment status, immigration status, race, experience with vaccination services, health insurance, parental beliefs, attitudes towards immunization, and adequate schedule information [23, 25]. Although not all the variables studied by Kitamura et al (2013) and Danis et al (2010) were studied in this work, maternal factors were clearly shown to affect commencement, continuation, and completion of the required number of immunizations as maternal age, education, and occupation were still statistically significant factors affecting immunization coverage in multivariate analysis [23,25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We inferred that the establishment of herd immunity might be weak or delayed and more children might be under the risk of acquiring VPDs than that indicated by the coverage estimates that did not consider the completeness and the timeliness. These findings were consistent with the reports from both the developed and the developing areas, [12][13][14][15] where substantial vaccination incompleteness or delays were observed despite the reasonably high estimates of coverage, calling for the completeness and the timeliness of vaccination to be considered as the alternative indicators of the performance of NIP. Furthermore, we found that the completeness and the timeliness of all 12 doses scheduled 12 months of age were higher in the intervention group than the control group even if the other demographics were controlled.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%