1987
DOI: 10.2307/1938385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting Accumulation or Loss of Macroorganic Matter in Salt Marsh Sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
20
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of decay coefficients we measured (0 to 0.376 yr −1 ) was slightly lower than ranges of decay measured elsewhere in the mid-Atlantic for S. alterniflora and Juncus roemerianus roots and rhizomes (0.11 to 0.51 yr −1 ) (Blum and Christian, 2004) and for newly senescent P. australis and S. patens litter (0.25 to 0.57 yr −1 ) (Windham, 2001), suggesting that our experimental approach captured the well-documented decline in decay rates across the continuum from fresh litter to SOM. Our results are consistent with previous work in salt marshes that indicates decomposition rates are not strongly related to flooding duration and soil redox potential (Valiela et al, 1982;Hackney, 1987;Blum, 1993;Blum and Christian, 2004). Moreover, Blum (1993) concludes that the insensitivity means that differences in organic matter accumulation between high and low marsh areas must be explained by differences in root production rather than differences in decay.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The range of decay coefficients we measured (0 to 0.376 yr −1 ) was slightly lower than ranges of decay measured elsewhere in the mid-Atlantic for S. alterniflora and Juncus roemerianus roots and rhizomes (0.11 to 0.51 yr −1 ) (Blum and Christian, 2004) and for newly senescent P. australis and S. patens litter (0.25 to 0.57 yr −1 ) (Windham, 2001), suggesting that our experimental approach captured the well-documented decline in decay rates across the continuum from fresh litter to SOM. Our results are consistent with previous work in salt marshes that indicates decomposition rates are not strongly related to flooding duration and soil redox potential (Valiela et al, 1982;Hackney, 1987;Blum, 1993;Blum and Christian, 2004). Moreover, Blum (1993) concludes that the insensitivity means that differences in organic matter accumulation between high and low marsh areas must be explained by differences in root production rather than differences in decay.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Responses in salt marshes are also variable. Nyman and DeLaune (1991), for example, measured reduced soil respiration rates in more flooded environments, but several authors have concluded that flooding frequency and redox potential play only minor roles in determining organic decay rates (Valiela et al, 1982;Hackney, 1987;Blum, 1993;Blum and Christian, 2004). Such a conclusion is perhaps surprising when viewed in the context of experiments conducted in terrestrial ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, more detailed studies at this site (Blum, 1993), and elsewhere (e.g. Valiela et al, 1982Valiela et al, , 1984Bertness, 1985;Hackney, 1987) indicate that soil moisture and/or redox potential is not a strong determinant of decomposition rates in tidal marshes. Although we acknowledge that other environmental variables may be at play, we therefore conclude that the steady increase in decay rate through time is the result of warming.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The prescence of living roots may also have had an effect on root decay in the periodically flooded treatment. Hackney (1987) suggested that living roots alter the chemical environment of the soil and may, therefore, accelerate decay of soil organic matter. In the mesocosms, the litter bags were buried at least 0,5 m from the nearest cypress seedlings, so roots in the litter bags were not initially in contact with living roots.…”
Section: Biotic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine roots represent a large and dynamic portion of belowground biomass, soil delritus, and nutrient capital; however, there have been few studies in which root decomposition or turnover have been measured (Waid 197,~, McGinty 1976, Hackney and de la Cr~ 1980, Harris et al 1980, Brinson et al 1981, McClaugherty et al 1982, Ellison et al 1986, Hackney 1987, Tupacz 1988, Gallagher 1988. In a periodically flooded wetland, fluctuating water levels are likely to have significant effects on belowground ecosystem dynamics (Dickson andBroyer 1972, Reddy andPatrick 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%