Factor Analysis and Score Distributions of the HIP — Replication by a Second Examiner

DeBetz, Barbara; Stern, Daniel N.

doi:10.1080/00029157.1979.10403205

Cited by 12 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The analysis of data showed the same distribution within each patient population in each therapist's sample. There was confirmation and agreement between the samples that approximately 75% of the subjects were hypnotizable (20% low, 48% midrange, and 7% high) and about 25% were not (DeBetz & Stern, 1979) (see Figure 4). …”

Section: Eye-roll Sign and The Hypnotic Induction Profilementioning

confidence: 53%

“…A range of 20% to 30% showed evidence of cognitive impairment because of various psychiatric disorders. This was subsequently studied on a total of 4,621 cases and the same distribution was replicated (DeBetz & Stern, 1979). About 50% of the "softs" (see Figure 4) were initially unresponsive hypnotically; then, after therapy, many of these Figure 4) remained nonhypnotizable even after therapy.…”

Section: Eye-roll Sign and The Hypnotic Induction Profilementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The sample of outpatients is large enough to support the hypothesis that hypnotizability, as measured by the HIP, can be assessed on a continuum and indicates a probabilistic presence or absence of psychopathology (DeBetz & Stern, 1979;H. Spiegel, 1977;H.…”

Section: Eye-roll Sign and The Hypnotic Induction Profilementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Neural Trance:A New Look at Hypnosis

Spiegel

2007

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hypnosis has had a gradual conceptual emergence from an alleged mystical experience, to sleep, to a psychological shift in concentration that activates a preexisting neuro-physiological circuitry. Data are presented to support the thesis that hypnotizability exists on a spectrum that has biological as well as psychosocial components. When there is synchrony between the bio-psychosocial components of hypnotizability as measured by the Hypnotic Induction Profile (an intact flow), psychotherapy is the primary treatment strategy, with medication secondary or not at all. When measurement reveals a lack of synchrony between biological factors as measured by the Eye-Roll sign and psychosocial responsivity (a nonintact flow), medication will be primary, with different degrees of psychosocial support.

show abstract

Section: Eye-roll Sign and The Hypnotic Induction Profilementioning

confidence: 53%

Section: Eye-roll Sign and The Hypnotic Induction Profilementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Neural Trance:A New Look at Hypnosis

Spiegel

2007

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When measurement with the HIP is used, studies have shown that approximately 75% of the population have trance capacity with a distribution of approximately 20% low, 48% mid-range and 7% high; with about 25% of the population who have no trance capacity (DeBetz & Stern, 1979;H. Spiegel, Fleiss, Bridger & Aronson, 1975;H.…”

Section: Defining Hypnosismentioning

confidence: 98%