Illusion That the Eye-Roll Sign Is Related to Hypnotizability

Hearth and Campfire Influences on Arterial Blood Pressure: Defraying the Costs of the Social Brain through Fireside Relaxation

“…A team of trained raters conducted scoring to achieve agreement. Despite a 75% success rate in predicting hypnotizability in clinical cases, the validity of the eye-roll test relative to other hypnotizability measures is only 0.22 (Hilgard, 1981(Hilgard, , 1982, but it has the benefit of providing a spot assessment not possible via other methods.…”

Hearth and Campfire Influences on Arterial Blood Pressure: Defraying the Costs of the Social Brain through Fireside Relaxation

“…A team of trained raters conducted scoring to achieve agreement. Despite a 75% success rate in predicting hypnotizability in clinical cases, the validity of the eye-roll test relative to other hypnotizability measures is only 0.22 (Hilgard, 1981(Hilgard, , 1982, but it has the benefit of providing a spot assessment not possible via other methods.…”

Quantifying Consciousness

“…Although Spiegel's (1974) Hypnotic Induction Profile provides a briefly administered measure of hypnotizability, the use of the eye-roll sign as part of the induction procedure has not been empirically supported (Hilgard, 1982).…”

Adverse behavior associated with the eye-roll test of hypnotizability: Clinical and theoretical considerations.

“…Spiegel & D. Spiegel, 1978). Conversely, Hilgard (1982) on the basis of rigorous statistical analysis concluded that there was a low correlation between eye-roll and hypnotizability and that the claims for HIP validity were unsubstantiated. Wheeler et al (1974) reported an experimental study in which there were nonsignificant correlations between the eye-roll and other measures of hypnotizability.…”

Hearth and Campfire Influences on Arterial Blood Pressure: Defraying the Costs of the Social Brain through Fireside Relaxation

“…A team of trained raters conducted scoring to achieve agreement. Despite a 75% success rate in predicting hypnotizability in clinical cases, the validity of the eye-roll test relative to other hypnotizability measures is only 0.22 (Hilgard, 1981(Hilgard, , 1982, but it has the benefit of providing a spot assessment not possible via other methods.…”

Quantifying Consciousness

“…Although Spiegel's (1974) Hypnotic Induction Profile provides a briefly administered measure of hypnotizability, the use of the eye-roll sign as part of the induction procedure has not been empirically supported (Hilgard, 1982).…”

Adverse behavior associated with the eye-roll test of hypnotizability: Clinical and theoretical considerations.

“…Spiegel & D. Spiegel, 1978). Conversely, Hilgard (1982) on the basis of rigorous statistical analysis concluded that there was a low correlation between eye-roll and hypnotizability and that the claims for HIP validity were unsubstantiated. Wheeler et al (1974) reported an experimental study in which there were nonsignificant correlations between the eye-roll and other measures of hypnotizability.…”

Hearth and Campfire Influences on Arterial Blood Pressure: Defraying the Costs of the Social Brain through Fireside Relaxation

“…A team of trained raters conducted scoring to achieve agreement. Despite a 75% success rate in predicting hypnotizability in clinical cases, the validity of the eye-roll test relative to other hypnotizability measures is only 0.22 (Hilgard, 1981(Hilgard, , 1982, but it has the benefit of providing a spot assessment not possible via other methods.…”

Quantifying Consciousness

“…Although Spiegel's (1974) Hypnotic Induction Profile provides a briefly administered measure of hypnotizability, the use of the eye-roll sign as part of the induction procedure has not been empirically supported (Hilgard, 1982).…”

Adverse behavior associated with the eye-roll test of hypnotizability: Clinical and theoretical considerations.

“…Spiegel & D. Spiegel, 1978). Conversely, Hilgard (1982) on the basis of rigorous statistical analysis concluded that there was a low correlation between eye-roll and hypnotizability and that the claims for HIP validity were unsubstantiated. Wheeler et al (1974) reported an experimental study in which there were nonsignificant correlations between the eye-roll and other measures of hypnotizability.…”