2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitation dynamics of late somatosensory evoked potentials after sural nerve stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…); and (3) the so‐called ‘refractory’ inhibition associated with somatosensory gating has been found to be fully degraded by 5 s (Zakharova et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…); and (3) the so‐called ‘refractory’ inhibition associated with somatosensory gating has been found to be fully degraded by 5 s (Zakharova et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A 500 ms interval between the pulse pairs is known to elicit robust SG responses (Adler et al 1982;Bak et al 2011;Hsiao et al 2013). Moreover, we used a 4.3-4.8 s interstimulus interval (ISI) between pulse trains because previous MEG studies have found that: (1) the benefit of longer ISIs falls off exponentially after ß4.0 s (Ahlfors et al 1993;Raij et al 2003); (2) studies of somatosensory responses from the secondary cortices have found such responses are strongest when using ISIs around 5.0 s (Wikström et al 1996); and (3) the so-called 'refractory' inhibition associated with somatosensory gating has been found to be fully degraded by 5 s (Zakharova et al 2016).…”
Section: Experimental Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%