2008
DOI: 10.1177/1080569908330374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitating Teamwork With Lean Six Sigma and Web-Based Technology

Abstract: is usually a good thing, but conflicts about interpersonal or procedural issues can hurt a team. Groups can become more inhibited when tasks are complex or ambiguous, so create frequent opportunities for groups to meet and exchange information.• Be sure that groups structure their tasks to meet the project's goals.Ask teams to create a project plan that includes task analysis, task management, a timeline, and document management (be clear on your style and format expectations). The plan should divide the writi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aligning with the idea of preparing students for teamwork by helping them understand their preferences, some scholars suggest grouping diverse and complementary students together based on the results of personality tests (Scarfino & Roever, 2009;Amato & Amato, 2005). Others recommend collecting information from students about their majors, abilities, interests, and other assets (Roebuck, 1998;Krause, 2009). On the other hand, in McAlister's (2006) courses, students' work with clients, and the student groups are formed based on affinity for particular clients and student availability.…”
Section: Forming Student Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aligning with the idea of preparing students for teamwork by helping them understand their preferences, some scholars suggest grouping diverse and complementary students together based on the results of personality tests (Scarfino & Roever, 2009;Amato & Amato, 2005). Others recommend collecting information from students about their majors, abilities, interests, and other assets (Roebuck, 1998;Krause, 2009). On the other hand, in McAlister's (2006) courses, students' work with clients, and the student groups are formed based on affinity for particular clients and student availability.…”
Section: Forming Student Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task schedules or implementation plans detail the tasks necessary to complete the project and the team member(s) who will complete each task, including a deadline for each task (Wolfe, 2010;McAlister, 2006;Krause, 2009). Wolfe (2010) recommended that each task should be rated for difficulty so as to ensure "fairer" distribution of workload.…”
Section: Managing Course-based Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the kick‐off event, students are grouped into project teams of three or four students and each team is given a circuit breaker that has been opened to reveal the inner mechanisms (for a more detailed discussion of Six Sigma student project teams, see Krause, 2009). The students also receive a memo from the company describing the market, product, and possible problems.…”
Section: Course Structurementioning
confidence: 99%