2008
DOI: 10.1080/10887150801967712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitating an organization to embrace a work-life effectiveness culture: A practical approach.

Abstract: As noted in the articles throughout this special issue, researchers consistently demonstrate the value and benefit of addressing work-life issues in the workplace. What can psychologist-managers do to create a work environment where employees believe they are valued as whole individuals who contribute to work and also have lives outside of work? How do organizations foster a culture and climate supportive of work-life effectiveness? The purpose of this paper is to provide a practical approach for developing st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Koppes (2008) referenced a Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM) panel, which predicted that "family and life interests will play a more prominent role in people' s lives" and "employees will demand increases in workplace flexibility in order to pursue life interests" (p. 181). We conducted a brief exploration of career goals to expose the forces driving this demand.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Koppes (2008) referenced a Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM) panel, which predicted that "family and life interests will play a more prominent role in people' s lives" and "employees will demand increases in workplace flexibility in order to pursue life interests" (p. 181). We conducted a brief exploration of career goals to expose the forces driving this demand.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training should start at the top of the organization and cascade down through the ranks. If HRD hopes to change a culture, then senior leaders must first understand how flexibility helps the bottom line (Koppes, 2008). Senior leaders must attend training that explains the organizational benefits of family-friendly policies (Rogier & Padgett, 2004) and they must embrace and be active participants in the cultural shift.…”
Section: Implications For Hrd and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In organizations, work-life effectiveness could mean the implementation of practices and policies that are responsive to the work-life needs of employees (Koppes & Swanberg, 2008), including assisting workers in managing their time (e.g., flexible scheduling), providing resources for worklife demands (e.g., childcare options in the community), providing financial assistance (e.g., tuition reimbursement), and offering direct services to the worker (e.g., on-site medical services, fitness facility; Koppes, 2008). Although work-life effectiveness has been minimally studied in CW, evidence from previous research points to work-family conflict as a challenge in the profession.…”
Section: Social Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If unemployed women who want to resume employment are a potential strategic resource, organizations must adopt managerial competencies that are supportive of recruiting and retaining them (Schwartz, 1989; Blum et al , 1994). Given these women's preference for work‐family balance, organizations should experiment with various policies and practices to identify and adopt those that fit with the corporate culture and support women's life‐balancing efforts (Almer et al , 2003; Edwards and Robinson, 2004; Kossek and Lee, 2008; Koppes, 2008). Such policies may include equal opportunity (Brewer, 2000; Wirth, 2001), FWA (Guy, 1993), and affirmative action policies (Wirth, 2001; Atkinson and Hall, 2009).…”
Section: Women and Fwas: A Competency‐based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have demonstrated that flexible work arrangements (FWAs) are increasingly part of a strategic decision by organizations to respond to the changing needs of both their markets and their workforce (Böheim and Taylor, 2004; Koppes, 2008; Cahuc and Carcillo, 2011; Russell and McGinnity, 2011). For instance, organizations with a greater range of FWAs have higher perceived performance and can better meet the dual goals of increased service and work‐life balance (Bailyn et al , 2001; Eaton, 2003; Perry‐Smith and Blum, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%