“…22,53,89 Being motivated by the increasing demand to overcome these limitations, graphene-based materials have recently emerged as promising HTL alternatives to PEDOT:PSS with advantages of solution-processability, flexibility, high optical transparency, tunable optical band gap, a high electron-blocking capability and competitive electrical conductivity. 204 In this regard, nanocomposites of GO with copper zinc tin selenide (Cu 2 ZnSnSe 4 ) nanocrystals treated with pyridine (CZTSe-Py), 128 gold nanostructures (Au NSs), 45 MoO 3 , 32 and copper(II) chloride (CuCl 2 ), 30 have been employed as HTLs in OSCs based on P3HT:PCBM, PTB7: PC 71 BM, poly[N-9 0 -heptadecanyl-2,7-carbazole-alt-5,5-(4 0 , 7 0 -di-2-thienyl-2 0 ,1 0 ,3 0 benzothiadiazole)] (PCDTBT): PC 71 BM), and PTB7-Th:PC 71 BM active layer blends. This resulted in devices with PCEs of 0.95%, 5.88%, 7.07% and 7.68%, respectively, which were comparable to the PEDOT:PSS control devices, and outperformed the devices based on pristine GO, as well as those without HTLs.…”