2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00015-019-00340-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facies and depositional environments of the Upper Muschelkalk (Schinznach Formation, Middle Triassic) in northern Switzerland

Abstract: Subsurface sedimentary strata in northern Switzerland, such as the Middle Triassic Upper Muschelkalk, are attracting interest as potential reservoirs for CO 2 sequestration and for geothermal energy production. Characterizing facies in such strata aids prediction of reservoir properties in unexplored areas. Although well studied elsewhere, the Swiss Upper Muschelkalk has received little attention despite containing the southern-most deposits of the Central European Basin. The Upper Muschelkalk represents the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Lockhart Limestone originated on a typical carbonate homoclinal shelf, which develops at low slope angles during times of minimal tectonic activity, resulting in relatively uniform deposition over large regions. Transitional deposition occurs below the wave base from the inner (near shoreline) to the middle shelf (deeper) zones (Adams & Diamond, 2019). Following a basin‐wide unconformity, facies alternations (together with changes in fossil material) between LMF1, LMF2 and LMF3 (Figures 3 and 4) indicate two very short‐term cycles of deepening and shallowing upwards, coinciding with transgression and regression cycles in the area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lockhart Limestone originated on a typical carbonate homoclinal shelf, which develops at low slope angles during times of minimal tectonic activity, resulting in relatively uniform deposition over large regions. Transitional deposition occurs below the wave base from the inner (near shoreline) to the middle shelf (deeper) zones (Adams & Diamond, 2019). Following a basin‐wide unconformity, facies alternations (together with changes in fossil material) between LMF1, LMF2 and LMF3 (Figures 3 and 4) indicate two very short‐term cycles of deepening and shallowing upwards, coinciding with transgression and regression cycles in the area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the Ramp Microfacies Types (RMF) (Flügel, 2010), these microfacies are interpreted as the deposits of a middle ramp environment. The mid‐ramp facies association is characterized by wackestone, packstone and floastone microfacies, indicate low to moderate energy condition (Adams & Diamond, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The horizons BMa and BTe are taken from Nagra (2019). Mesozoic depositional environment after Adams and Diamond (2019) and Nagra 1989. OMM, Upper Marine Molasse (Obere Meeresmolasse); TER, terrigenous sediments and karst; USM, Lower Freshwater Molasse (Untere Süßwassermolasse).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The horizons BMa and BTe are taken from Nagra (2019). Mesozoic depositional environment after Adams and Diamond (2019) (Malz et al, 2015;Marchant et al, 2005). Jurassic thickness variations have independently been documented from sedimentological studies showing facies boundaries and thickness maxima to occur in close spatial relationship to Upper Palaeozoic basins (Allenbach, 2001;Wetzel & Allenbach, 2003).…”
Section: Significance Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%