Facial, verbal, and symbolic stimuli differently affect the right hemisphere preponderance of stimulus‐preceding negativity

Ohgami, Yoshimi; Kotani, Yasunori; Arai, Jun-Ichirou; Kiryu, Shigeru; Inoue, Yusuke

doi:10.1111/psyp.12234

Cited by 16 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 72 publications

(85 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The early portion of the SPN (the second 1,000 ms of the 5,000‐ to 15,000‐ms delay interval) at electrode Fz was found to be larger in individuals with greater left occipital lobe activation (MNI coordinates −8, −90, −18, which are similar to −24, −92, −10 in the PUN condition of our study, Table ). In a principal component analysis, Ohgami and colleagues () found that the factor corresponding best to the early SPN loaded heavily on activity in the medial occipito‐parietal area. Based on this evidence, we think it likely that fusiform gyrus activity in Experiment 2 could be related to continued processing of the recently presented cues.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anterior insula activity and the effect of agency on the Stimulus‐Preceding Negativity

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

If you know that you are the author of a freely chosen action and that you bear responsibility for its outcome, then you are said to have “a sense of agency.” When there is a delay between action and outcome, this response must be remembered if you are to learn from the experience. Previous studies have shown that the Stimulus‐Preceding Negativity (SPN) recorded during the delay interval is larger under conditions that foster a sense of agency. In an EEG experiment (N = 27), we confirmed that the SPN is larger when participants have a choice between two responses in a gambling task as compared to when there is only a single button and the computer determines the monetary outcome. This SPN agency effect was largest over right prefrontal cortex and it did not vary significantly between trial blocks in which only gains or only losses were possible. Participants in a second experiment (N = 26) performed the same task while activity in anterior insular cortex, a known SPN generator, was measured via functional magnetic resonance image (fMRI). An essentially identical pattern of results was obtained: Activity was greater on choice than no‐choice trials, especially for the right hemisphere, and no effect of contextual valence was observed. Although parallel observations such as these cannot warrant causal inference, our findings are consistent with the assumption that anterior insular cortex contributes to the effect of agency on the SPN.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anterior insula activity and the effect of agency on the Stimulus‐Preceding Negativity

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, anticipation of verbal and symbolic stimuli increases the amplitude of the late component of SPN, which shows the maximum amplitude during the latter part of the anticipating interval. On the other hand, anticipation of facial stimuli increases the amplitude of the early component of SPN that shows the maximum amplitude during the earlier part of an anticipatory interval 27) . This means that face anticipation is faster than verbal and symbolic stimuli.…”

Section: Right Hemisphere Preponderance Of Spn and Functional Differementioning

confidence: 99%

Anticipation process of the human brain measured by stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN)

Kotani

Ohgami

Yoshida

et al. 2017

JPFSM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The human brain is activated even before a stimulus occurs if a person knows the stimulus will happen within a few seconds. The neural basis for this cognitive function, termed anticipation, is the subject of this review. One method for investigating the brain mechanism of anticipation employs stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), which is a type of event-related potential (ERP). A critical feature of SPN is that SPN amplitude is greater at the right than at the left hemisphere. This feature suggests that the right hemisphere plays a significant role in the anticipation process. Some neuroimaging studies identified the anterior insula as a physiological source of SPN. The anterior insula is a part of the salience network that detects stimulus salience. Furthermore, recent neuroimaging studies reveal that the right anterior insula is involved in processing the salience outcome, whereas the left anterior insula is related to behavioral adaptation. The SPN study combining functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and ERP revealed that the right anterior insula showed increased activity preceding a stimulus, while the left anterior insula was not activated. Such studies lead to the hypothesis that saliency of an anticipated stimulus evokes the salience network in advance of a stimulus, and that this network then pre-activates other brain regions in perception of an anticipated stimulus. These processes can be shown as SPN variations in amplitude and cortical distribution. In general, SPN studies suggest that the saliency of an anticipated stimulus is a key factor in evoking anticipatory brain activity. Keywords : stimulus-preceding negativity, insular cortex, salience network Anticipation and event-related potentials (ERP)Anticipation is a cognitive phenomenon characterized by an individual's preparatory state of mind with respect to a forthcoming event or stimulus. Anticipation facilitates overt behavioral responses that render it possible for the individual to react faster to such events than without anticipation. On the other hand, anticipating an unwanted stressful event in the near future, for example, a student concerned about an upcoming examination, may sometimes also trigger strong anxiety. Investigating the neural mechanism of anticipation is also crucial for understanding how athletes exhibit fast and accurate movements in games, and why, on the other hand, some patients suffer from anticipatory anxiety in hospitals. In this review, we introduce studies concerned with stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN) that reflect anticipation. This entails a discussion of the neural mechanisms that underlie SPN and it leads to the revelation of a key factor in the evocation of brain activity related to anticipation.Studies on human brain activity related to anticipation date from the 1960's when the use of event-related potential (ERP) became popular 1) . The ERP is calculated from the electroencephalogram (EEG). To calculate ERP, an EEG is first determined by a duration with times fixed before and after reco...

show abstract

“…We measured the temporal dynamics of the SPN (i.e. −2000–0 ms) because previous research has demonstrated that different SPN phases may reflect distinct cognitive states ( Moris et al , 2013 ; Ohgami et al , 2014 ; Seidel et al , 2015 ). The RewP was isolated using the difference-score method, which has been recommended in a recent meta-analysis of RewP studies to avoid component overlap ( Sambrook and Goslin, 2015 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neural dynamics of monetary and social reward processing in social anhedonia

Wang

Nie

et al. 2020

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Being characterized by reduced pleasure from social interaction, social anhedonia constitutes a transdiagnostic marker for various psychiatric disorders. However, the neural portrait of social anhedonia remains elusive because of heterogeneities of reward type and reward dynamics in previous studies. The present event-related potential (ERP) study investigated neural dynamics in response to monetary and social rewards in social anhedonia. ERP responses were examined when a high social anhedonia (HSA, N = 23) group and a low social anhedonia (LSA, N = 26) group were anticipating and consuming social and monetary rewards. During the anticipatory phase, the stimulus-preceding negativity was increased for monetary compared to social rewards in the LSA group but not the HSA group. During the consummatory phase, the reward positivity was increased for monetary relative to social rewards, which was found for the LSA group but not the HSA group. These results could result from an increased relevance of social rewards or a general decline in affective responding due to a potential association between social anhedonia and depression. Our findings provide preliminary evidence for neural aberrations of the reward system in social anhedonia, which is contingent upon reward type and reward dynamics.

show abstract

Facial, verbal, and symbolic stimuli differently affect the right hemisphere preponderance of stimulus‐preceding negativity

Cited by 16 publications

References 72 publications

Anterior insula activity and the effect of agency on the Stimulus‐Preceding Negativity

Anterior insula activity and the effect of agency on the Stimulus‐Preceding Negativity

Anticipation process of the human brain measured by stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN)

Neural dynamics of monetary and social reward processing in social anhedonia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About