2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions 2009
DOI: 10.1109/achi.2009.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial Expression Recognition with 3D Deformable Models

Abstract: We present a fully automated three-dimensional modelbased, real-time capable approach to distinguish six universal facial expressions from visual images of human faces. The face model is fitted to the images of a publicly available data base. From the model parameters two sets of features are computed, person-specific and non-person-specific to estimate the facial expression visible in the current image sequence. We integrate the complex, state-of-the-art Candide-3 face model, which is specifically appropriate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous works by the same authors [ 43 ], a sequence of RGB images was used for recognizing a set of basic emotions from facial expressions using Gabor filtering (a method that had several limitations based on the distance to the sensor). Others similar works are evaluated, which use the Cohn-Kanade Facial Expression Database and the mesh model Candide-3, but with different classification systems: Bayesian network [ 11 ] and model tree [ 10 ]. In order to perform a comparative study, four different aspects are taken into account: accuracy, the number of human emotions recognized by the algorithms, methods and classification systems.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous works by the same authors [ 43 ], a sequence of RGB images was used for recognizing a set of basic emotions from facial expressions using Gabor filtering (a method that had several limitations based on the distance to the sensor). Others similar works are evaluated, which use the Cohn-Kanade Facial Expression Database and the mesh model Candide-3, but with different classification systems: Bayesian network [ 11 ] and model tree [ 10 ]. In order to perform a comparative study, four different aspects are taken into account: accuracy, the number of human emotions recognized by the algorithms, methods and classification systems.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of classifiers, such as the Bayesian approach, represents a common solution in the literature for emotion recognition systems from facial expressions. However, there are many alternatives to this type of classifier, such as support vector machine (SVM) [ 9 ], model tree [ 10 ], binary decision tree [ 11 ] and neural networks [ 12 ], among others. Dynamic Bayesian networks are an interesting solution for emotion recognition from dynamic images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before implicitly adapting to the mood of the user, the emotional state of the user has to be determined and mapped to the continuous PAD space. Ideally, this can be achieved by emotion recognition modules [34,60], but at least according to an explicit statement in the course of the social subdialog introduced above, and/or in combination with an initial self-assessment of the user on the PAD dimensions. When this is achieved, the robot shifts its base-PAD values for emotional expressions towards the mood of the user as a new starting point for potential emotional variations, e.g.…”
Section: Implicit Emotional Adaptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The block size is chosen by trading off between efficiency and accuracy. In this procedure, each triangle is weighted Mayer et al (2009) 87.1% TAN Cohen et al (2003) 83.3% LBP + SVM Shan et al (2009) 92.6% IEBM Asthana et al (2009) 92.9% Fixed Jacobian Asthana et al (2009) 89.6% STMF + DT 93.2% Table 6. Comparison of gender classification in comparison to different approaches in Hadid & Pietikaeinen (2009) equally toward the feature calculation and face edges are not destroyed but rather provide the detailed texture information that might be lost during conventional image warping approach.…”
Section: Pose Invariant Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%