2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faced with exclusion: Perceived facial warmth and competence influence moral judgments of social exclusion

Abstract: The current research investigates how facial appearance can act as a cue that guides observers' feelings and moral judgments about social exclusion episodes. In three studies, we manipulated facial portraits of allegedly ostracized persons to appear more or less warm and competent. Participants perceived it as least morally acceptable to exclude a person that appeared warm-and-incompetent. Moreover, participants perceived it as most acceptable to exclude a cold-and-incompetent looking person. In Study 2, we al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This impact of facial masculinity/femininity persisted even though much more distinct and likewise visibly perceived information, that is, gender category information was provided. The finding that facial features strongly impacted personality ascriptions fits well into existing literature showing that people base diverse social judgments of others on subtle facial information, for example, about sexual orientation [49], political orientation [50], morality [51], criminality [52], or central personality dimensions [21]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This impact of facial masculinity/femininity persisted even though much more distinct and likewise visibly perceived information, that is, gender category information was provided. The finding that facial features strongly impacted personality ascriptions fits well into existing literature showing that people base diverse social judgments of others on subtle facial information, for example, about sexual orientation [49], political orientation [50], morality [51], criminality [52], or central personality dimensions [21]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…So, exactly the same sort and amount of information was manipulated in all faces. This method has been shown to generalize across participants and faces before [16,21,51,52]. Secondly, the statistical method we applied to analyze our data, namely the linear mixed models analyses included random effects for participants and faces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes of machine learning based models will be in some way a reflect of the learning data they use, i.e., in the case of first impression analysis, the labels provided by the annotators. The validity of such data can be very subjective due to several factors, such as cultural [28], [29], social [21], [30], contextual [20], gender [31], [32], appearance [33], etc., which makes the research and development on personality perception a very challenging task.…”
Section: How Challenging and Subjective Can Be Apparent Personality Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aimed for a minimum sample of 160 participants, which would provide manipulated facial appearance and followed a similar experimental design (Rudert, Reutner, Greifeneder, & Walker, 2017). We recruited 204 MTurk workers.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%