2005
DOI: 10.1007/11527923_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face Recognition with the Multiple Constrained Mutual Subspace Method

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we propose a novel method named the Multiple Constrained Mutual Subspace Method which increases the accuracy of face recognition by introducing a framework provided by ensemble learning. In our method we represent the set of patterns as a low-dimensional subspace, and calculate the similarity between an input subspace and a reference subspace, representing learnt identity. To extract effective features for identification both subspaces are projected onto multiple constraint subspaces. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCA-based method is known as Eigenface 12) and LDA-based method is known as Fisherface 13) . Other methods employ subspace methods such as CLAss-Featuring Information Compression (CLAFIC) method 14) , subspace method 14) , mutual subspace method and its extensions such as constrained mutual subspace method 15) , and multiple constrained mutual subspace method 16) , etc., where such a feature is represented as a set of bases of the subspace. The approaches mentioned above transform the highdimensional image space into the low-dimensional subspaces and provide good representation and good dis-crimination for face recognition by selecting effective subspaces.…”
Section: Feature Extraction and Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCA-based method is known as Eigenface 12) and LDA-based method is known as Fisherface 13) . Other methods employ subspace methods such as CLAss-Featuring Information Compression (CLAFIC) method 14) , subspace method 14) , mutual subspace method and its extensions such as constrained mutual subspace method 15) , and multiple constrained mutual subspace method 16) , etc., where such a feature is represented as a set of bases of the subspace. The approaches mentioned above transform the highdimensional image space into the low-dimensional subspaces and provide good representation and good dis-crimination for face recognition by selecting effective subspaces.…”
Section: Feature Extraction and Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method Key-frame based Approaches [90], [40], [47], [114], [100], [17], [115], [31], [78], [85], [98], [101], [118] Temporal Model based Approaches [74], [73], [72], [75], [18], [24], [67], [69], [68], [122], [120], [123], [121], [64], [65], [66], [79], [55], [2], [43], [50], [49] Image-Set Matching based Approaches Statistical model-based [93], [4], [96], [7], [10], [6], [9] Mutual subspace-based [110], [90], [35], [82], [108], [56], [57], [5]<...>…”
Section: Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is based on the assumption that images are drawn from some distributions on the underlying face pattern manifold, and normally statistical learning algorithms are adopted to model the distribution. Recently, following the mutual subspace method [110], many approaches build a compact model of the distribution by representing each image set as a linear subspace, and measure their similarity using the canonical angles [110,82,59]. In the following sections, we discuss these two groups of approaches: statistical model-based and mutual subspace-based, respectively.…”
Section: Image-set Matching Based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the methods that compare a set to a set, canonical correlations 1 of linear subspaces have attracted much attention with the benefits of robust and computationally efficient matching when dealing with changing conditions of data acquisition and large volumes of data as input for decision making [4,5,7,8]. The previous method called Constrained Mutual Subspace Method (CMSM) finds the constrained subspace where the entire class populations exhibit small variance [8,10]. Then, each class subspace is projected on this constrained subspace to create a model and compared by canonical correlations with the new data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%