2020
DOI: 10.3390/app11010089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face Gender Recognition in the Wild: An Extensive Performance Comparison of Deep-Learned, Hand-Crafted, and Fused Features with Deep and Traditional Models

Abstract: Face gender recognition has many useful applications in human–robot interactions as it can improve the overall user experience. Support vector machines (SVM) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been used successfully in this domain. Researchers have shown an increased interest in comparing and combining different feature extraction paradigms, including deep-learned features, hand-crafted features, and the fusion of both features. Related research in face gender recognition has been mostly restricted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(183 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Althnian et al [ 65 ] presented three handcrafted features, which can be extracted from facial image using LBP, HOG, and PCA. Furthermore, the authors employed deep CNN features, and fused features based on three combinations dubbed LBP-DL, HOG-DL, and PCA-DL.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Althnian et al [ 65 ] presented three handcrafted features, which can be extracted from facial image using LBP, HOG, and PCA. Furthermore, the authors employed deep CNN features, and fused features based on three combinations dubbed LBP-DL, HOG-DL, and PCA-DL.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Althnian et al ( 2021 ) have employed three methods, including LBP, HOG, and PCA as handcrafted features, deep CNN features, and fused features based on three combinations named LBP-DL, HOG-DL, and PCA-DL. Furthermore, gender identification task is realized by two classifiers, SVM and CNN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of this method is that, the GA exhibits high computational complexity. Althnian et al [4] used hand crafted and fused features for face gender recognition where they have used both SVM and CNN and gained best accuracy 86.60% using CNN which can be improved further. Serna et al [29] worked on gender detection using VGG and ResNet where they analyzed how bias affects deep learning.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%