2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2011.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of well-dispersive yttrium-stabilized cubic zirconia nanoparticles via vapor phase hydrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The diffraction pattern is in good agreement with the database for YSZ (JCPDS 301468), matching well with that of the cubic fluorite-type phase (space group Fm 3 m ) commonly found for fully yttria-stabilized zirconia . However, with XRD alone, it is difficult to distinguish between cubic and tetragonal YSZ phases as they share common diffraction patterns . Thus, Raman spectroscopy is used as a complementary characterization to confirm the crystalline nature of Y 2 O 3 –ZrO 2 .…”
Section: Results and Disscussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The diffraction pattern is in good agreement with the database for YSZ (JCPDS 301468), matching well with that of the cubic fluorite-type phase (space group Fm 3 m ) commonly found for fully yttria-stabilized zirconia . However, with XRD alone, it is difficult to distinguish between cubic and tetragonal YSZ phases as they share common diffraction patterns . Thus, Raman spectroscopy is used as a complementary characterization to confirm the crystalline nature of Y 2 O 3 –ZrO 2 .…”
Section: Results and Disscussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…39 However, with XRD alone, it is difficult to distinguish between cubic and tetragonal YSZ phases as they share common diffraction patterns. 41 Thus, Raman spectroscopy is used as a complementary characterization to confirm the crystalline nature of Y 2 O 3 −ZrO 2 .…”
Section: ■ Results and Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36-1415) . Additional peaks for ZrO 2 are assigned as 2θ = 24.32 and 75.76°, corresponds to (111) and (400) planes, respectively . All of these reflections confirm the crystallinity and the presence of M–O units within the adsorbents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In both catalyst samples, a series of well‐defined peaks can be identified at 2θ = 30.06°, 34.73°, 50.16°, 59.8°, and 62.59°, which can be assigned to the diffractions of the (101), (110), (200), (211), and (202) crystalline planes of cubic phase ZrO 2 (JCPDS card no. 49‐1642), respectively 30 . Peaks related to NiO were not visible at the catalyst loading of 5% ( see Figure S1), however, increasing the catalyst loading to 10% the peaks were detected at 2θ = 27.32°, 43.3°, and 62.8°, which can be assigned to the diffractions of the (111), (200), (220) crystalline planes of cubic NiO 31,32 (JCPDS card no.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%