The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1111/jace.18781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of submicron Li‐rich Li2(Ti,Zr)O3 solid solution ceramics with sluggish grain growth rate

Abstract: Doping and forming solid solution is an effective approach to tailor densification and grain growth. In this study, submicron Li2(Ti,Zr)O3 solid solution ceramics was successfully fabricated by a modified solid‐state route for the first time. The use of appropriate starting powders can greatly reduce the synthesis temperature, and the preparation of Li2(Ti,Zr)O3 with submicron grain size is possible. The substitution of Ti by Zr will inhibit the phase transition from cubic to monoclinic structure, as well as t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values were low compared with the Li 2 TiO 3 pebbles fabricated by the other methods and similar to those of Li 4 SiO 4 -Li 2 TiO 3 biphasic pebbles fabricated by melt process; the crush loads of Li 2 TiO 3 pebbles by emulsion method, 34 Li 2 TiO 3 pebbles by piezoelectric microdroplet jetting, 11 Li-rich Li 2 TiO 3 pebbles by rolling method, 35 and Li 4 SiO 4 -Li 2 TiO 3 pebbles by melt process 24 are 37.2, 25.7, 10-41, and 5-15 N. Crush load of the pebbles could be improved by an additional heat treatment and/or compositional modification, as reported in the previous studies. 22,36 Particularly, an addition of Li 2 CO 3 to the initial powder as a sintering aid may contribute both to densification and increase of Li/Ti ratio. 37 F I G U R E 4 Size distributions of the pebbles fabricated with the laser powers of 6.9 J (A), 7.9 J (B), 9.0 J (C), and 9.8 J (D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values were low compared with the Li 2 TiO 3 pebbles fabricated by the other methods and similar to those of Li 4 SiO 4 -Li 2 TiO 3 biphasic pebbles fabricated by melt process; the crush loads of Li 2 TiO 3 pebbles by emulsion method, 34 Li 2 TiO 3 pebbles by piezoelectric microdroplet jetting, 11 Li-rich Li 2 TiO 3 pebbles by rolling method, 35 and Li 4 SiO 4 -Li 2 TiO 3 pebbles by melt process 24 are 37.2, 25.7, 10-41, and 5-15 N. Crush load of the pebbles could be improved by an additional heat treatment and/or compositional modification, as reported in the previous studies. 22,36 Particularly, an addition of Li 2 CO 3 to the initial powder as a sintering aid may contribute both to densification and increase of Li/Ti ratio. 37 F I G U R E 4 Size distributions of the pebbles fabricated with the laser powers of 6.9 J (A), 7.9 J (B), 9.0 J (C), and 9.8 J (D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%