2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of porous titanium implants with biomechanical compatibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, porous Ti seemed to be a viable candidate for use in dental and biomedical applications, such as implants and tissue-engineering scaffolds [3][4][5][6][7] . Methods used to produce porous bulk Ti included loose powder sintering, gelcasting, and slurry foaming 6,8,9) . However, these traditional fabrication methods exhibit limitations in the production of complex three-dimensional (3D) structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, porous Ti seemed to be a viable candidate for use in dental and biomedical applications, such as implants and tissue-engineering scaffolds [3][4][5][6][7] . Methods used to produce porous bulk Ti included loose powder sintering, gelcasting, and slurry foaming 6,8,9) . However, these traditional fabrication methods exhibit limitations in the production of complex three-dimensional (3D) structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sabemos que un implante demasiado rígido puede producir un estrés local secundario, que contribuya a medio-largo plazo a una osteopenia, al contrarrestarse los estímulos necesarios para un correcto remodelado óseo 24,25 . No obstante, cuando ese implante se va a utilizar como medio de transferencia de información para posicionar un fragmento osteotomizado, este debería ser rígido, o con una capacidad de recuperación elástica a la deformación elevada, para no introducir errores durante la cirugía.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…• A pore size greater than 100 µm to facilitate bone colonization (Shiomi et al, 2004;Xue et al, 2007 ;Chen et al, 2009) .…”
Section: Criteria For Elementary Pattern Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xue et al (2007) demonstrated that the bone colonization is impossible for a pore size under 100 µm . Chen et al (2009) tested the osteogenesis on structures with pores ranging from 100 to 400 µm but did not speak out against higher pore dimensions . Hollander et al (2006) tested porous structure with pore dimensions of 500, 700 and 1000 µm and concluded that the growth of human osteoblast is possible for all these types of porosities .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%