2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of macromolecular gradients in aligned fiber scaffolds using a combination of in-line blending and air-gap electrospinning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, micropatterned collectors can be designed to obtain aligned porous scaffolds containing both micro/macropores and a nanofibrous structure without requiring additional control or postprocessing steps; [39,83] gradients in both the radial direction and the longitudinal direction can also be directly incorporated into the macroporous hydrogel by designing appropriate mandrel-based collectors. [84,85] The main drawback of electrospinning is the stability of the resulting macroporous networks (particularly under pressure) given that there are typically no bonds between the fibers themselves, making them relatively easy to compress. In addition, while the nanofiber diameter can be precisely controlled, it is much more challenging to control the spacing between the fibers given the random whipping motion that occurs upon solvent evaporation.…”
Section: Electrospinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, micropatterned collectors can be designed to obtain aligned porous scaffolds containing both micro/macropores and a nanofibrous structure without requiring additional control or postprocessing steps; [39,83] gradients in both the radial direction and the longitudinal direction can also be directly incorporated into the macroporous hydrogel by designing appropriate mandrel-based collectors. [84,85] The main drawback of electrospinning is the stability of the resulting macroporous networks (particularly under pressure) given that there are typically no bonds between the fibers themselves, making them relatively easy to compress. In addition, while the nanofiber diameter can be precisely controlled, it is much more challenging to control the spacing between the fibers given the random whipping motion that occurs upon solvent evaporation.…”
Section: Electrospinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…employed in‐line blending to fabricate gelatin/polyurethane scaffolds for wound dressing applications . In‐line blending also permits generation of gradients across the depth of a scaffold . By connecting two solutions in parallel and decreasing the flow of solution 1 while increasing the flow rate of solution 2, groups have been able to establish a steady compositional gradient between the solutions.…”
Section: Electrospinning Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co‐electrospinning is often conducted upon a rotating mandrel which enables the formation of gradients perpendicular to fiber alignment. To fabricate scaffolds with gradients in the direction of fiber alignment, the in‐line blending and gap electorspinning approaches (mentioned above) were combined . The in‐line blending approach enabled a temporal gradient, which was then electrospun onto a wheel of parallel copper wires that rotated at a rate synced to that of the produced gradient.…”
Section: Electrospinning Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8][9][10][11] On the other hand, random nanofibers are better suited for the repair of disorganized tissues such as bone, skin, and cartilage. [18,19] It was reported that the electrospun nanofibers in a nonwoven mat could be welded at their cross points when the sample was exposed to the vapor from a solvent. [15][16][17] However, the effectiveness of this class of scaffolds is compromised by the lack of a continuous gradation between the uniaxially aligned and random nanofibers.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/marc201900579mentioning
confidence: 99%