2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of asymmetric nanostarch reinforced Chitosan/PVP membrane and its evaluation as an antibacterial patch for in vivo wound healing application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimised CS-FeHAp films showed a porosity of 53.6 ± 0.9%. This value is comparable to what reported by Poonguzhali et al [41], although in other studies chitosan-based films showed higher porosity [39]. It has to be highlighted, however, that porosity can be affected by many parameters, including chitosan degree of reticulation as well as possible additives added to the matrix [41].…”
Section: Porositysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The optimised CS-FeHAp films showed a porosity of 53.6 ± 0.9%. This value is comparable to what reported by Poonguzhali et al [41], although in other studies chitosan-based films showed higher porosity [39]. It has to be highlighted, however, that porosity can be affected by many parameters, including chitosan degree of reticulation as well as possible additives added to the matrix [41].…”
Section: Porositysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…To improve its flexibility, CO and PVP were added. 32,37,38 The results demonstrated that the elongation of the films was then greatly improved. In particular, the PVB/CO/ST had better tensile strength and elongation at break for the same thickness of film and thus was selected for subsequent experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The injured area was photographed, and its dimension was measured using a digital caliper and Image J software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD) at 0, 2, 5, 7, 10, and 14 days of treatment [ 25 ]. Results were expressed as percentage wound closure relative to the original wound size [ 26 ] using Equation (3), % wound closure = wound area day 0 − wound area day n/wound area day 0 where wound area at day 0 was the original wound area after the surgery and wound area at day n was the wound area on n days of post wounding (day 2, 5, 7, 10, and 14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%