2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7en00412e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of a phosphorylated graphene oxide–chitosan composite for highly effective and selective capture of U(vi)

Abstract: The synthesized GO–CS–P exhibits ultrafast removal kinetics, high sorption capacity and great selectivity towards U(vi).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No obvious change is found for the peaks of C=C/C‐C. However, the chemical shift of C‐N indicates a certain interaction between 4,4′‐bipyridine and Ni 2+ ions . Two binding energy peaks of O 1s in H 4 TBAPy are observed at 532.9 and 532.3 eV, which are allocated to C‐O and C=O bonds, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…No obvious change is found for the peaks of C=C/C‐C. However, the chemical shift of C‐N indicates a certain interaction between 4,4′‐bipyridine and Ni 2+ ions . Two binding energy peaks of O 1s in H 4 TBAPy are observed at 532.9 and 532.3 eV, which are allocated to C‐O and C=O bonds, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The pseudo‐second‐order kinetic model was defined as Equation tQnormalt=1kQnormale2+1Qnormalewhere k was the pseudo‐second‐order rate constant of adsorption (g mg −1 min −1 ), t was the adsorption time (min), and Q e and Q t were the amounts of U(VI) adsorbed (mg g −1 ) at equilibrium and at contact time t , respectively. The selectivity coefficient K s (U/M), which was described in Equation , was introduced to compare the selectivity of the NPS‐GLCs to capture U(VI) from the mixed solution of U(VI) and the competitive ions as followsKnormalS UM=Kd,UKd,Mwhere K d,U (mL g −1 ) and K d,M (mL g −1 ) are the distribution coefficients of U(VI) and the competing metal ion, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) Q m (mg/g)Sorbents (ref. ) Q m (mg/g)AMGO 34 123.40Al 2 O 3 nanofibres 35 204.10Fe-SC 36 148.99Fe 3 O 4 @TiO 2 37 118.80Fe 3 O 4 /GO 38 69.49Layered double oxides/carbon 39 354.2Magnetic cucurbit[6]uril/GO 40 122.50g-C 3 N 4 @Ni-Mg-Al-LDH 41 99.7Oxime-grafted CMK-5 42 62.00 l -C 3 N 4 /PDA/PEI 3 43 60.51Polyacrylamide–hydroxyapatite 44 0.95TiO 2-x 45 65Polypyrrole 46 87.72CaTiO x ; CaAlO x 47 241.7; 258.29Amidoxime modified Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 48 105.50Titanate 49 358Modified silica gel 50 90.30CNFs 51 125Birnessite-modified pine biochar 52 47.05p-AO/ CNFs; c-AO/CNFs 53 588.24; 263.18Talc 54 41.60RUB-15 55 152MnO 2 –Fe 3 O 4 –RGO 56 108.70GO-CS-P 57 779.44SA/CMC-Ca-Al 58 101.76Ca/Al-LDH@CNTs 59 382.9Phosphate-modified pine wood sawdust 60 74.10GO (Present study)16.03GOMO (Present study)153.85…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%