2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.599795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of a 3D nano-imprint template with a conformal dry vapor deposited electron beam resist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current process is also not capable of fabricating a two-level structure where the features of the “top” level sit inside the trenches (rather than on top of the ridges) of the “bottom” level. Such a structure can only be fabricated using the conventional method involving two separate EBL steps, as demonstrated in Ref [4]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current process is also not capable of fabricating a two-level structure where the features of the “top” level sit inside the trenches (rather than on top of the ridges) of the “bottom” level. Such a structure can only be fabricated using the conventional method involving two separate EBL steps, as demonstrated in Ref [4]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to improved alignment accuracy, the process consists of fewer steps than previous mold fabrication process that involves two EBL steps and two pattern transfer steps by etching. Moreover, in the previous process, the resist for the second pattern level is spun on a non-flat surface consisting of features of the first pattern level, which leads to resist film thickness non-uniformity and process error unless a dry evaporated resist is used [3,4]. This problem is not an issue for the current process since the bi-layer resists are spun on a flat wafer surface one after the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%