2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication and plastic deformation of sub-micron cadmium structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work shows that the critical resolved shear stresses are sensitive to the size of the specimen, with the flow stresses approaching the ideal strength of the material as the specimen size is decreased (Yu et al, 2010;Lilleodden, 2010;Ye et al, 2011;Sun et al, 2011;Jin et al, 2012). This size effect seems to be insignificant for samples larger than % 5 mm (Byer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This work shows that the critical resolved shear stresses are sensitive to the size of the specimen, with the flow stresses approaching the ideal strength of the material as the specimen size is decreased (Yu et al, 2010;Lilleodden, 2010;Ye et al, 2011;Sun et al, 2011;Jin et al, 2012). This size effect seems to be insignificant for samples larger than % 5 mm (Byer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…33 This fabrication method has proved versatile in producing small-scale metallic structures for uniaxial compression tests. 10,18,19,26,[38][39][40][41] The advantage of this technique over the conventional FIB milling process is the elimination of tapered geometries and the significant impact of high energy Ga 1 exposure on the pillar microstructure. 30,31 Briefly, silicon (111) substrates coated with a 20-nm titanium adhesion layer and a 100-nm gold seed layer were first spin coated with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) electron beam lithography resist.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same smaller-is-stronger effect has been observed in other crystalline systems, such as tetragonal, 18 rhombohedral, 19 and hexagonal close packed (HCP). [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Size-dependent mechanical behaviors in nanoscale metals are generally attributed to the competition between the rate of dislocations generated by applied stress and the rate of dislocation annihilation at free surfaces. [27][28][29] With decreasing sample size, the rate of dislocation annihilation during applied stress exceeds that of dislocation generation, thus yielding a crystal, which has a much lower dislocation density or is even completely absent of dislocations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%