1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1997.tb00421.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabric characteristics of subaerial slope deposits

Abstract: The clast fabrics of certain types of terrestrial slope deposits are reviewed and compared, including the deposits of rockfalls, solifluction, debris flows, dry grain flows, frost‐coated clast flows and run‐off. The analysis is based on modern deposits in active environments. The study shows that fabric characteristics allow discrimination between ‘collective’and individual movement of rock particles. The individual particle movement generally results in a random clast orientation, whereas the processes of ‘co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

15
130
0
21

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
15
130
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas snow avalanche deposits result from the erosion and entrainment of rocks by snow avalanches, talus slopes form mainly as a consequence of rockfall (Jomelli and Francou, 2000). Although rockfall and snow avalanches are the dominant depositional mechanisms behind talus and snow avalanche deposits, debris flows and rainwash and snowmelt water processes may also influence their formation (White, 1981;Bertran et al, 1997). In addition, between these two types of landform there exist transitional deposits that result from some combination of all the different mechanisms described above (Jomelli and Francou, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas snow avalanche deposits result from the erosion and entrainment of rocks by snow avalanches, talus slopes form mainly as a consequence of rockfall (Jomelli and Francou, 2000). Although rockfall and snow avalanches are the dominant depositional mechanisms behind talus and snow avalanche deposits, debris flows and rainwash and snowmelt water processes may also influence their formation (White, 1981;Bertran et al, 1997). In addition, between these two types of landform there exist transitional deposits that result from some combination of all the different mechanisms described above (Jomelli and Francou, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Log 7, organic (Table 4). In contrast, in Log 9, organic material in LFA3a returned two much younger radiocarbon ages of 6969 ± 39 and 8150 ± 40 14 C yrs BP respectively (Table 4/ Fig. 13).…”
Section: Lfa3mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These deposits are likely to have formed through gravitationally driven slope wash, debris flow and solifluction [14], sourced from steep terrain backing a number of delta sites. Stratification and a clear sorted structure are indicative of an overland flow component [15].…”
Section: Lfa4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Los abanicos aluviales han sido tradicionalmente asumidos como el arquetipo del ambiente de piedemonte y, por lo tanto, sus depósitos largamente citados en la literatura geológica como las acumulaciones clásicas y casi excluyentes, en áreas de frentes de montañas (Blair y McPherson, 1994;Talling et al, 1995;Bertran et al, 1997;Bilkra y Nemec, 1998;Howard et al, 2007;Suriano y Limarino, 2009). Comúnmente, estas geoformas se desarrollan al frente de los macizos montañosos, y pueden ser caracterizadas por el tamaño de sus depósitos, la composición de los clastos, las tasas de sedimentación y el transporte de sedimentos (Colombo, 1992;Saito y Oguchi 2005;Curry y Morris 2004;Ballantyne, 2002;Collinson, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified