2021
DOI: 10.1364/ol.426543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

F-mode ultraviolet photoacoustic remote sensing for label-free virtual H&E histopathology using a single excitation wavelength

Abstract: Photoacoustic remote sensing (PARS) is a novel all-optical imaging modality that allows for non-contact detection of initial photoacoustic pressures. Using 266-nm excitation pulses, ultraviolet PARS (UV-PARS) has previously demonstrated imaging contrast for cell nuclei in histological samples with < Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24][25][26] A recent advancement in non-contact imaging, known as UV photoacoustic remote sensing (UV-PARS), has emerged with a reflection-mode configuration, enabling histopathology of animal and human tissues without a water coupling medium. [27][28][29] The UV-PARS achieves high-resolution imaging using high-NA objectives, unlike the UV-PAM which requires partially distinct optical and acoustic paths. However, the optical heterogeneity in biological tissues induces light scattering only in the excitation beam of the UV-PAM, while the UV-PARS suffers from pronounced light scattering in both the excitation and detection beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] A recent advancement in non-contact imaging, known as UV photoacoustic remote sensing (UV-PARS), has emerged with a reflection-mode configuration, enabling histopathology of animal and human tissues without a water coupling medium. [27][28][29] The UV-PARS achieves high-resolution imaging using high-NA objectives, unlike the UV-PAM which requires partially distinct optical and acoustic paths. However, the optical heterogeneity in biological tissues induces light scattering only in the excitation beam of the UV-PAM, while the UV-PARS suffers from pronounced light scattering in both the excitation and detection beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 c. UV-PARS was first demonstrated by Haven et al 12 for cell nuclei imaging and further improved in subsequent reports 13 , 14 . Integration of near-infrared (NIR) scattering microscopy further enabled simultaneous acquisition of complementary virtual eosin contrast co-registered with the UV-PARS images 15 17 , simplifying the complexity of previous dual-contrast approaches 18 , 19 . The NIR scattering was later upgraded to 266 nm pulsed UV scattering along with a pulse peak sample-and-hold detection circuit to achieve improved resolution in the virtual eosin data 20 utilizing the existing excitation laser source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, in PAM and PARS [2], [19]- [21], [24]- [26], only a scalar amplitude is extracted from each TD signal, accomplished by either using a Hilbert transform [27] to find an envelope of the signal, from which the difference between maximum and minimum values is computed, or by directly computing the difference between maximum and minimum of the raw TD signal itself. Recently, other methods have been developed to extract additional information related to the frequency content of the signals, as a means of inferring information related to the imaged target [28]- [30]. This work takes a different approach by proposing an unsupervised (clustering) approach to learn time-domain features that relate to the underlying target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%