2014
DOI: 10.1080/1941126x.2014.939038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ezproxy for Electronic Resource Librarians: Conference Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was our understanding that often additional analytical software is required to make sense of this complex EZproxy data. Thus, it was useful to read that both Austin College (Ajamie et al, 2014) and Ohio State University Libraries (Murphy, 2013) used Google Analytics on their EZproxy data set to identify which were the main resources being used, when (time/day) the most use took place each week, and what devices were being used to access their library.…”
Section: How Other Academic Institutions Use the Ezproxy Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was our understanding that often additional analytical software is required to make sense of this complex EZproxy data. Thus, it was useful to read that both Austin College (Ajamie et al, 2014) and Ohio State University Libraries (Murphy, 2013) used Google Analytics on their EZproxy data set to identify which were the main resources being used, when (time/day) the most use took place each week, and what devices were being used to access their library.…”
Section: How Other Academic Institutions Use the Ezproxy Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In addition to the vendors' usage reports, librarians and researchers have made use of other vendor reports and locally collected statistics to determine usage and identify users' behaviors. Sources of statistics included web server logs, 4 OpenURL link resolver reports, 5 consortial usage reports, 6 Google Analytics, 7 vendor reports, 8 and EZproxy server logs. 9 Attempts to get more granular data about patrons' behavior is not new.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%