1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1988.tb01231.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eyelid Reconstruction Using a Monopedicle Flap and Buccal Mucosa: Report of 15 Cases

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eyelid reconstructive in humans that utilize free oral mucosal flaps are well-established. [52][53][54][55][56][57] However, the use of this free graft technique in veterinary literature is limited. Previously described use of this technique includes case reports of an upper eyelid repair in a horse following full-thickness melanoma excision, upper eyelid reconstruction following surgical trauma in a dog, and a case series of 13 eyes in seven cats to repair feline eyelid agenesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eyelid reconstructive in humans that utilize free oral mucosal flaps are well-established. [52][53][54][55][56][57] However, the use of this free graft technique in veterinary literature is limited. Previously described use of this technique includes case reports of an upper eyelid repair in a horse following full-thickness melanoma excision, upper eyelid reconstruction following surgical trauma in a dog, and a case series of 13 eyes in seven cats to repair feline eyelid agenesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vascular anastomoses will begin to develop in the revascularization phase (days 4–11), and within 7 days a network of vessels begin penetrating the graft tissue, which signals the beginning of the tissue maturation phase (day 11–42). Eyelid reconstructive surgeries in humans that utilize free oral mucosal flaps are well‐established 52–57 . However, the use of this free graft technique in veterinary literature is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the oral mucosal graft does not provide production of the mucosal component of the tear film due to the absence of goblet cells, 12 the remaining conjunctiva would compensate such a minor functional deficit. 13 This prefabricated graft harvest is extremely easy, and its donor-site morbidity is among the lowest within all of the techniques using cartilage grafts and might be proposed as an alternative for patients who underwent previous septoplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage is that hard palate mucosa is best harvested with the patient sedated or under general anaesthesia, therefore may not be suitable for all patients. Buccal mucosa grafts25 may be more easily harvested under local anaesthesia but do not provide structural support per se in the lower lid. Other autogenous grafts include auricular cartilage,14 which may be harvested in small amounts from the concha under local anaesthesia, and free tarsoconjunctival grafts21 24 which are also easily harvested, but healing of the donor site may theoretically exacerbate upper eyelid retraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery to correct lower eyelid retraction may include either a graft or a non-graft technique 1-24. Grafts may be autogenous—for example, as hard palate mucosa,13 15 20 auricular cartilage,14 tarsal conjunctiva,21 24 and buccal mucosa,25 or may be from an exogenous donor such as sclera. Donor sclera has a risk of transmission of HIV or slow viruses, may be of limited availability and may not be acceptable to the patient for ethical reasons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%