Eyeface: A new multimethod tool to evaluate the perception of conceptual user experiences

Erle, Ganix Lasa; Justel, Daniel; Retegi, Aiur

doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.015

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In recent decades, a lot of effort has been made to consider user perception during the design process. Proof of this is the large number of tools which have been developed based on the evaluation of user experience (Engage, 2006Lasa et al, 2015.). However, designers frequently fail to recognize the importance of object based evaluation.…”

Section: Visual Aesthetic Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A New Method to Evaluate Good Design for Brand Recognition in the Digital World

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Visual aesthetics has become a crucial element in strengthening brand experience. In the digital era, however, designers need to approach aesthetics from a holistic standpoint where both traditional and more modern factors are taken into consideration. In this paper we present digital BrandUX, a new method to improve brand consistency through the evaluation of aesthetic features. It builds on the Design Format Analysis (DFA) of Warell ( 2001) with the addition of a structured step-by-step approach. To test the method we analysed two web sites using both DFA and digital BrandUX. The results showed that digital BrandUX is a promising advance in aesthetic evaluation, assisting designers in identifying a greater number of visual aesthetic features. Moreover, the method ensured that the designers explored and identified all types of factors, with the exception of language. Future lines include the development of a handbook to improve ease of use of the method.

show abstract

Section: Visual Aesthetic Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A New Method to Evaluate Good Design for Brand Recognition in the Digital World

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In order to reduce the lack of specific experience design evaluation tools, a new multi-method tool Eyeface (Lasa, Justel & Retegi, 2015) has been created to facilitate the understanding of user's perceptions in the conceptual phase.…”

Section: Eyefacementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, and based on these keys, a new multimethod tool has recently been developed. It evaluates the ideas of experiences within the conceptual design phase, and it is called Eyeface tool (Lasa, Justel & Retegi, 2015). A tool that evaluates by combining two independent biometric devices: Eye-tracking and Facereader.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Next generation of tools for industry to evaluate the user emotional perception: the biometric-based multimethod tools

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

More and more companies are adding emotional features into the development process of their financial offer, developing new products and services based on the emotional motivations of users. However, the subjectivity of the experience and the complexity of its variables has become one of the biggest challenges for businesses today. In recent years many tools have been created in order to explore the user's emotional perception, but there are still shortcomings. Experience design professionals have pointed out the need for further assessment work and in this paper the biometric-based multimethod tools are reviewed. Within this type, one of the most focused experience evaluation tool is analyzed: the Eyeface. A tool that consists of two devices, the Eye-tracking and Facereader. The research work concludes that the biometric-based multimethod tools will be the key element to face the ultimate integration of the emotional approach into the business world in the near future.

show abstract

“…Traditional QoE/UX evaluation mechanisms are subjective by nature because they are based on techniques that depend on users’ reports and evaluators’ analysis influenced by their perception, criteria, and experience, among other personal factors [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Several evaluation approaches have been proposed for complementing subjective techniques with quality ratings or mental states inferred from user’s physiological and behavioral data (e.g., [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]). Even though research has been done to interpret the mental states of users when performing certain activities—even critical ones, such as driving, piloting, and air traffic control (e.g., [ 15 , 16 , 17 ])—the relations between these states and elements of an interface or interaction mechanisms have yet to be identified and adequately represented.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review for Cognitive State-Based QoE/UX Evaluation

Bañuelos-Lozoya

Serna

González-Franco

et al. 2021

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional evaluation of user experience is subjective by nature, for what is sought is to use data from physiological and behavioral sensors to interpret the relationship that the user’s cognitive states have with the elements of a graphical interface and interaction mechanisms. This study presents the systematic review that was developed to determine the cognitive states that are being investigated in the context of Quality of Experience (QoE)/User Experience (UX) evaluation, as well as the signals and characteristics obtained, machine learning models used, evaluation architectures proposed, and the results achieved. Twenty-nine papers published in 2014–2019 were selected from eight online sources of information, of which 24% were related to the classification of cognitive states, 17% described evaluation architectures, and 41% presented correlations between different signals, cognitive states, and QoE/UX metrics, among others. The amount of identified studies was low in comparison with cognitive state research in other contexts, such as driving or other critical activities; however, this provides a starting point to analyze and interpret states such as mental workload, confusion, and mental stress from various human signals and propose more robust QoE/UX evaluation architectures.

show abstract

Eyeface: A new multimethod tool to evaluate the perception of conceptual user experiences

Cited by 11 publications

References 10 publications

A New Method to Evaluate Good Design for Brand Recognition in the Digital World

A New Method to Evaluate Good Design for Brand Recognition in the Digital World

Next generation of tools for industry to evaluate the user emotional perception: the biometric-based multimethod tools

A Systematic Review for Cognitive State-Based QoE/UX Evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About