2022
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12091205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye Movement Control in Tibetan Reading: The Roles of Word Length and Frequency

Abstract: We investigated the effects of word length and frequency on eye movement control during Tibetan reading through two experiments. A preliminary experiment examined the predictive effect of word length and frequency on fixation duration and landing position using multiple linear regression analysis. In the formal experiment, we manipulated the length and frequency of target words simultaneously to investigate the effects of word length and frequency on fixation duration and landing position in Tibetan reading. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of experiment 2 show that there are word length effect and word frequency effect in Tibetan reading, and there is a bias toward fixation position in Tibetan reading, and fixation position is mainly affected by low-level factors, while high-level factors have no effect on fixation position, which is consistent with the results of Pinyin text research. This shows that although Tibetan and Chinese belong to the Sino Tibetan language family, and their writing structure is similar to that of Chinese, Chinese is an ideographic character, while Tibetan itself is an alphabetic character, showing the same characteristics as alphabetic characters in terms of language type, pronunciation transparency, and character/word markers [9] .…”
Section: The Study Of Tibetan-chinese Bilingual Readingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The results of experiment 2 show that there are word length effect and word frequency effect in Tibetan reading, and there is a bias toward fixation position in Tibetan reading, and fixation position is mainly affected by low-level factors, while high-level factors have no effect on fixation position, which is consistent with the results of Pinyin text research. This shows that although Tibetan and Chinese belong to the Sino Tibetan language family, and their writing structure is similar to that of Chinese, Chinese is an ideographic character, while Tibetan itself is an alphabetic character, showing the same characteristics as alphabetic characters in terms of language type, pronunciation transparency, and character/word markers [9] .…”
Section: The Study Of Tibetan-chinese Bilingual Readingmentioning
confidence: 91%