2020
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00001.2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye, head, and gaze contributions to smooth pursuit in macular degeneration

Abstract: This article is the first to look at eye and head movements in observers with macular degeneration. It is the first to show that in older individuals, regardless of central field defect, freedom of head movement may reduce pursuit gain. Despite oculomotor limitations due to eccentric fixation, individuals with macular degeneration do not rely on head movements more than age-matched controls, with both groups having a similarly heterogenous eye and head movement strategy for pursuit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a visual grasping mode, instead of using stimuli that change in brightness, limiting eye-tracking data [ 28 ], moving stimuli could be used to attract a patient’s attention towards a new test area, which can occur in concomitance with self-calibration. Smooth-pursuit tasks in combination with head movements do not influence patients with both binocular and monocular visual loss more than normally sighted participants [ 44 ]. Hence, self-calibration systems that use smooth-pursuit for online visual field perimetry testing could overcome problems due to light conditions, patient fixational stability, eye physiology, and head movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a visual grasping mode, instead of using stimuli that change in brightness, limiting eye-tracking data [ 28 ], moving stimuli could be used to attract a patient’s attention towards a new test area, which can occur in concomitance with self-calibration. Smooth-pursuit tasks in combination with head movements do not influence patients with both binocular and monocular visual loss more than normally sighted participants [ 44 ]. Hence, self-calibration systems that use smooth-pursuit for online visual field perimetry testing could overcome problems due to light conditions, patient fixational stability, eye physiology, and head movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eye tracker can then collect the user's eye images corresponding to these target points and estimate the kappa angle. However, the same procedure might not work for low vision users [66]. For example, some low vision people's visual acuity might be too low to see the calibration targets clearly [46], leading to inaccurate calibration results; some may have irregular eye appearance that prevents pupil recognition (e.g., Coloboma [48]).…”
Section: How Does Eye Tracker Work?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pursuit target velocities ranged from 5 to 30°per second. Pursuit targets differed in size, 1°2 1,39,41 or 0.5°4 2 ; color, white 21,39,41 or red 42 ; and shape, type of dot (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Description Of the Paradigm(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macular Degeneration Smooth pursuit is impaired in people with macular degeneration. 21,39,41 The pursuit strategies adopted by individuals with macular degeneration showed high variability due to differences in scotoma(s), characteristics, and variations in the binocular overlap of the scotomas. 34 For those with overlapping scotomas, smooth pursuit gain was influenced by the direction of the target relative to the scotoma-whether it moved toward and into the scotoma or started in and moved away from the scotoma.…”
Section: Effects Of Vision Impairment On Smooth Pursuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation