2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00150-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye closure in darkness animates sensory systems

Abstract: Single subject and group analyses (n ϭ 12) showed that the eyes-open and eyes-closed states in complete darkness considerably and consistently differ in the patterns of associated brain activation in fMRI. During nonchanging external stimulation, ocular motor and attentional systems were activated when the eyes were open; the visual, somatosensory, vestibular, and auditory systems were activated when the eyes were closed. These data suggest that there are two different states of mental activity: with the eyes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
120
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(45 reference statements)
20
120
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These activations can be expected since open eyes produce a stimulation of the visual system which is not the case if the eyes are closed. Furthermore the result is in line with other fMRI studies contrasting eyes-open and eyes-closed states (Marx et al, 2004;Marx et al, 2003). The eyes-closed condition did not elicit any regions of greater activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These activations can be expected since open eyes produce a stimulation of the visual system which is not the case if the eyes are closed. Furthermore the result is in line with other fMRI studies contrasting eyes-open and eyes-closed states (Marx et al, 2004;Marx et al, 2003). The eyes-closed condition did not elicit any regions of greater activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is important because the two resting conditions do differ substantially in both EEG (Barry et al, 2007;Berger, 1929 ) and fMRI (Bianciardi et al, 2009;Marx et al, 2004;Marx et al, 2003). Indeed our results were highly condition and partly frequency specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that the conditions affect brain function more profoundly than one could expect from the simple blocking of visual input. However, the coupling differences are in line with EEG (Barry et al, 2007;Berger, 1929 ) and fMRI literature (Bianciardi et al, 2009;Marx et al, 2004;Marx et al, 2003;Yang et al, 2007) reporting EO/EC condition differences. With the increasing interest in resting state brain function, differences between EO and EC have likewise garnered interest, and they also relate to the debate about an optimal 'baseline' .…”
Section: Eeg-bold Signal Correlationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Significant differences in the properties of the brain's resting activity have been reported between these 2 states. [29][30][31][32][33][34] These differences include alterations in multiple EEG bands, 35,36 changes in the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in the visual cortex and paracentral lobule (note that this study acquired data from the posterior portion of the brain only, and so changes in other regions may also occur 34 ) and differences in activity levels in the sensory cortices. 31 Interestingly, it should be noted that the changes in brain activity seen between the eyes open and eyes closed conditions do not appear to be simply owing to a difference in the amount of light seen.…”
Section: Visual Noisementioning
confidence: 99%