2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrinsic and intrinsic quality cues in Chinese consumers’ purchase of pork ribs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since pictures are easy for the respondents to understand, they are close to real-world choices, and visual components have been found suitable for measuring preferences for product attributes such as packaging and visual marbling/fat content (Grunert et al, 2015) that relate to the perceived quality of pork.…”
Section: Questionnaire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since pictures are easy for the respondents to understand, they are close to real-world choices, and visual components have been found suitable for measuring preferences for product attributes such as packaging and visual marbling/fat content (Grunert et al, 2015) that relate to the perceived quality of pork.…”
Section: Questionnaire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only a few studies investigating pork consumption in China that relate the quality of pork to its product attributes. Grunert, Loose, Zhou, and Tinggaard (2015) conducted a choice-based conjoint analysis and showed that intrinsic cues (fat and color) influence the choice of pork and found that Chinese consumers consider freshness to be an important quality attribute. Several studies have shown that the origin of the meat has an impact on the purchase of meat (Acebron & Dopico, 2000) (Banovic, Grunert, Barreira, & Fontes, 2010) (Hoffmann, 2000), although none of them were specifically focused on pork or based on the Chinese market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others examine consumer perceptions and purchasing decisions regarding certified products. For example, by parsing the credence attributes that are signaled by different labels (Fernqvist and Ekelund 2014) and assessing the importance of certification against other food quality cues (e.g., Brach, Walsh, and Shaw 2017;Gracia and de-Magistris 2016;Grunert et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a results, several attributes are identified as the main extrinsic and intrinsic descriptors of the product (Font-i-Furnols & Guerrero, 2014) from which we highlight: The physiological quality cues such as the water-binding capacity (Bredahl et al, 1998), the colour, meat appearance and the shelf-life (Topel et al, 1976;Glitsch, 2000;Fortomaris et al, 2006;Ngapo et al, 2007), the fat content (Verbeke et al, 2005;, the price (Murphy et al 2015), the food safety claims (Finn & Louviere, 1992;Grunert, 2005;Grunert et al, 2015), the meat quality (Verbeke et al, 2010;Grunert et al, 2015), the origin (Huang & Fu, 1995;Ehmke et al, 2008), the product convenience (Grunert et al, 2004) the traceability (Loureiro et al, 2007), the brand and the label information Fenger et al, 2015), the production methods such as organic, conventional, free range and hormone free meats Dransfield et al, 2005), the health claims (Scollan et al, 2006;Realini et al, 2014), the ethical claims mainly animal welfare aspects (Verbeke & Viaene, 2000) and the environmental claims such as the carbon food print (Koistinen et al, 2013).…”
Section:  Attributes and Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%