2014
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme vulnerability of smallholder farmers to agricultural risks and climate change in Madagascar

Abstract: Across the tropics, smallholder farmers already face numerous risks to agricultural production. Climate change is expected to disproportionately affect smallholder farmers and make their livelihoods even more precarious; however, there is limited information on their overall vulnerability and adaptation needs. We conducted surveys of 600 households in Madagascar to characterize the vulnerability of smallholder farmers, identify how farmers cope with risks and explore what strategies are needed to help them ada… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
326
3
13

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 539 publications
(386 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(83 reference statements)
6
326
3
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Thorough analyses of the spatial distribution in vulnerability are therefore needed, be it in regards to the multitude of challenges affecting, e.g., urban areas [44] or the specific flooding risks due to the combined effects of climate change and socio-economic development [45]. Contrasting assessed vulnerability with existing risk-coping strategies and remaining adaptation needs, as, e.g., conducted by Harvey et al based on a survey of 600 smallholder households in Madagascar, enables jointly determining crucial elements, such as access to extension services, small-scale infrastructural improvements, access to safety nets and sustainable management of natural ecosystems [46]. Pillar 2 provides an overview of synergetic and conflicting changes in societal demand for ES under different global change and climate change scenarios, which can be translated into a set of design and adaptation targets, which forms the basis for designing future landscape options.…”
Section: P2: Exploring Societal Demands and Environmental Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thorough analyses of the spatial distribution in vulnerability are therefore needed, be it in regards to the multitude of challenges affecting, e.g., urban areas [44] or the specific flooding risks due to the combined effects of climate change and socio-economic development [45]. Contrasting assessed vulnerability with existing risk-coping strategies and remaining adaptation needs, as, e.g., conducted by Harvey et al based on a survey of 600 smallholder households in Madagascar, enables jointly determining crucial elements, such as access to extension services, small-scale infrastructural improvements, access to safety nets and sustainable management of natural ecosystems [46]. Pillar 2 provides an overview of synergetic and conflicting changes in societal demand for ES under different global change and climate change scenarios, which can be translated into a set of design and adaptation targets, which forms the basis for designing future landscape options.…”
Section: P2: Exploring Societal Demands and Environmental Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be justified given high dependence of many African economies on agriculture [9], which averagely accounts for about 30% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) [10]. Similarly, African smallholder farmers often exhibit high vulnerability to welfare shocks, among which uncertainties in weather is notable [7,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the increasing attention of research to climate impacts on smallholder farming, there is limited information on differential risks (both climate and non-climate related), and the mitigation and adaptation needs of smallholder farmers (Harvey et al 2014). Community-based risk assessments of agrarian communities, and agendas for reform, need to integrate the analysis of equality, power relations and justice within existing and new climate change interventions.…”
Section: Journal Of Political Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%