2017
DOI: 10.3390/su9081371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Landscape Approach: Closing the Gap between Theory and Application

Abstract: Abstract:Recently, the integrated landscape approach has gained increasing interest of the scientific community, as well as of organizations active in the field of sustainable development. However, the enthusiastic welcome is challenged by little consensus on theory, terminology and definitions. Moreover, the operationalization of the approach into practice is a major challenge. In this paper, we present a framework to operationalize the integrated landscape approach in practice by putting a long-term collabor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Karrasch et al [20] use landscape services in relation to the values achieved by adapting coastal landscapes to climate change, and they use them in a spatially explicit way by linking them to landscape elements. Burgi et al [21] use them as the connection between landscape functioning and the societal demands for landscape values as perceived by people. The main advantages of using landscape services in sustainable landscape management are that: (1) the concept links values to the ecological and physical functioning of the landscape; (2) by using the concept, a demand for future values by groups of stakeholders is stimulated (facilitating negotiations between land owners or managers and users); and (3) the concept facilitates social learning and collaboration among stakeholders with different interests and values [22].…”
Section: Social-ecological Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Karrasch et al [20] use landscape services in relation to the values achieved by adapting coastal landscapes to climate change, and they use them in a spatially explicit way by linking them to landscape elements. Burgi et al [21] use them as the connection between landscape functioning and the societal demands for landscape values as perceived by people. The main advantages of using landscape services in sustainable landscape management are that: (1) the concept links values to the ecological and physical functioning of the landscape; (2) by using the concept, a demand for future values by groups of stakeholders is stimulated (facilitating negotiations between land owners or managers and users); and (3) the concept facilitates social learning and collaboration among stakeholders with different interests and values [22].…”
Section: Social-ecological Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of this process is often in the form of a map and pictures of the future landscape. The recognition that social learning and knowledge sharing is crucial in finding a sustainable solution for a landscape area is the basis for the cyclic process scheme proposed by Burgi et al [21]. Here, design is the third step, following assessments of alternative future scenarios and a choice for one of them, and preceding implementation of adaptation measures.…”
Section: Creating Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The landscape approach has gained traction in the sustainable development agenda as a way to overcome the limitations of sectorial approaches, to address trade-offs within spatial units, and to enable a deeper understanding of change and resilience in socioecological systems (Freeman et al 2015;Bürgi et al 2017). But, how do we operationalize a landscape approach such as FLR?…”
Section: Challenges To Operationalizing Flrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design has also been conceptualized in a somewhat narrower meaning as the creative step in a joined learning cycle that includes understanding, exploration, design and transformation (Bürgi et al 2017). Steingröver et al (2010) reported how they facilitated a group of farmers and other stakeholders through a joined learning and design process aimed at creating a green infrastructure for the provision of landscape services.…”
Section: Linking Scale Levels In Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%