2015
DOI: 10.1111/bju.13381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme obesity does not predict poor cancer outcomes after surgery for renal cell cancer

Abstract: ObjectiveTo assess whether extreme obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m 2 ) is associated with peri-operative outcomes, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), or recurrencefree survival (RFS) after surgical treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients and MethodsAfter institutional review board approval, we used an institutional database to identify patients treated surgically between January 2000 and December 2014 with a pathological diagnosis of RCC. Comprehensive clinical and patho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obesity, hypertension and smoking are known risk factors of RCC [ 4 10 ]. Increased BMI was reported to be associated with high RCC incidence [ 11 – 13 ] both in men and women [ 14 ], however, extreme obesity didn’t predict poor cancer outcomes after surgery in RCC patients [ 15 ], which indicated that the association between BMI and RCC prognosis is controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the relationship between BMI and RCC mortality as well as postoperative survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obesity, hypertension and smoking are known risk factors of RCC [ 4 10 ]. Increased BMI was reported to be associated with high RCC incidence [ 11 – 13 ] both in men and women [ 14 ], however, extreme obesity didn’t predict poor cancer outcomes after surgery in RCC patients [ 15 ], which indicated that the association between BMI and RCC prognosis is controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the relationship between BMI and RCC mortality as well as postoperative survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike our study, previous studies focused on evaluating safety of minimally invasive surgical approach (laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy) among obese patients and found no association between obesity and warm ischemia time ( 18 - 20 ). Obesity was associated with length of hospital study in a study of patients who underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy ( 24 ), but obesity was not associated with EBL or length of hospital stay in others studies of patient who underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and studies including both nephrectomy types ( 22 , 23 , 41 , 42 ). In addition to potential differences in patients’ racial and ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds, this study has several differences from previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Multiple studies, including a recent meta‐analysis, have suggested that having a higher BMI is associated with improved outcomes in patients with RCC . However, a recent study did not find extreme obesity to be an independent predictor of worse disease recurrence or survival in a multivariate analysis of patients with RCC who were surgically treated …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 However, a recent study did not find extreme obesity to be an independent predictor of worse disease recurrence or survival in a multivariate analysis of patients with RCC who were surgically treated. 43 Because epigenetic changes are more tissue-specific and the blood cell methylation profile may not indicate the epigenetic state of the tumor, one of the strengths of the current study is the ability to perform methylation analysis in RCC paired tissue samples, thereby demonstrating the important role of methylation in RCC tumorigenesis and clinical outcome. Another strength of this study is that we performed the methylation analysis using a quantitative evaluation of DNA methylation such as pyrosequencing, which may be more optimal for exploring the clinical significance of a given aberrant promoter methylation because qualitative evaluation may have overvalued low-level methylation, which has less clinical significance.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%